These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16255393)

  • 1. Sampling plans for fitting the psychometric function.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Span J Psychol; 2005 Nov; 8(2):256-89. PubMed ID: 16255393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Empirical performance of optimal Bayesian adaptive estimation.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Span J Psychol; 2009 May; 12(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 19476214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of optimal data placement for psychometric function estimation: a computer simulation.
    Lam CF; Dubno JR; Mills JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):1969-76. PubMed ID: 10530021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The psi-marginal adaptive method: How to give nuisance parameters the attention they deserve (no more, no less).
    Prins N
    J Vis; 2013 Jun; 13(7):3. PubMed ID: 23750016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian adaptive estimation of arbitrary points on a psychometric function.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):147-74. PubMed ID: 17535585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A computer program for Spearman-Kärber and probit analysis of psychometric function data.
    Miller J; Ulrich R
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Feb; 36(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 15190695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Threshold estimation in two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) tasks: the Spearman-Kärber method.
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Apr; 66(3):517-33. PubMed ID: 15283075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Yes-no staircases with fixed step sizes: psychometric properties and optimal setup.
    García-Pérez MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Jan; 78(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 11233336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary.
    Klein SA
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1421-55. PubMed ID: 11800466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance metrics for an application-driven selection and optimization of psychophysical sampling procedures.
    Rinderknecht MD; Lambercy O; Gassert R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207217. PubMed ID: 30485350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Signal detection theory and vestibular perception: III. Estimating unbiased fit parameters for psychometric functions.
    Chaudhuri SE; Merfeld DM
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 225(1):133-46. PubMed ID: 23250442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating parameters for psychometric functions using the four-point sampling method.
    Lam CF; Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; He NJ; Mills JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Dec; 102(6):3697-703. PubMed ID: 9407661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Small-sample characterization of stochastic approximation staircases in forced-choice adaptive threshold estimation.
    Faes L; Nollo G; Ravelli F; Ricci L; Vescovi M; Turatto M; Pavani F; Antolini R
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Feb; 69(2):254-62. PubMed ID: 17557595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Denoising forced-choice detection data.
    García-Pérez MA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):75-100. PubMed ID: 19422731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of fixed-step-size and Bayesian staircases for sensory threshold estimation.
    Alcalá-Quintana R; García-Pérez MA
    Spat Vis; 2007; 20(3):197-218. PubMed ID: 17524255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forced-choice staircases with fixed step sizes: asymptotic and small-sample properties.
    García-Pérez MA
    Vision Res; 1998 Jun; 38(12):1861-81. PubMed ID: 9797963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determining thresholds using adaptive procedures and psychometric fits: evaluating efficiency using theory, simulations, and human experiments.
    Karmali F; Chaudhuri SE; Yi Y; Merfeld DM
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):773-89. PubMed ID: 26645306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Placement of observations for the efficient estimation of a psychometric function.
    Lam CF; Mills JH; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jun; 99(6):3689-93. PubMed ID: 8655800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimations by minimum relative entropy method.
    Amisaki T; Eguchi S
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1995 Oct; 23(5):479-94. PubMed ID: 8656343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating psychometric functions in forced-choice situations: significant biases found in threshold and slope estimations when small samples are used.
    O'Regan JK; Humbert R
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Nov; 46(5):434-42. PubMed ID: 2813028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.