These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1625541)

  • 1. Issue update: parental notification.
    Rhodes AM
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1992; 17(3):155. PubMed ID: 1625541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New abortion parental involvement laws continue trend toward modified requirements.
    Donovan P
    State Reprod Health Monit; 1995 Sep; 6(3):3-6. PubMed ID: 12346847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.
    Harrison LK; Naylor KL
    Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Supreme Court upholds parental notice requirements.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1990; 22(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 2226749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
    Haas-Wilson D
    J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Akron Center for Reproductive Health v. Slaby, 12 August 1988.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():46-7. PubMed ID: 12289574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Supreme Court refuses South Dakota appeal in parental notice case.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1996 May; 5(9):2. PubMed ID: 12291324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights.
    Wing KR
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1990; 15(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 2081895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unconstitutionality of abortion laws affirmed.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):48. PubMed ID: 12309514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences.
    Koslov TI
    Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. State regulation of abortion upon minors: the Supreme Court permits parental notification statutes.
    Harper LF
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1990 Oct; 79(10):771-4. PubMed ID: 2230616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. U.S. Supreme Court refuses to review decision invalidating provisions in Louisiana parental consent law.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1997 Oct; 6(18):2. PubMed ID: 12321265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. State cannot require all minors to seek parental consent for abortion (Illinois).
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Oct; 7(5):75-6. PubMed ID: 12277895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Planned Parenthood Association of Atlanta Area v. Miller.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
    Fed Report; 1991 Jun; 934():1462-82. PubMed ID: 11648400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tracking the trends. Year-end review of 1995 state actions on reproductive health policy. Abortion services.
    Sollom T
    State Reprod Health Monit; 1995 Dec; 6(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 12291286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Supreme Court bars mandatory parental role in minors' abortions.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):37-9. PubMed ID: 12278191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parental Notification Act, 14 April 1987.
    United States. Georgia
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1987; 14():340-2. PubMed ID: 12346697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Iowa trial court blocks parental notification law.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1997 Jan; 6(2):2. PubMed ID: 12292101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Planned Parenthood Association of Atlanta Area v. Harris.
    U.S. District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
    Fed Suppl; 1987 Sep; 670():971-98. PubMed ID: 11648379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Zbaraz v. Hartigan.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    Fed Report; 1985 May; 763():1532-60. PubMed ID: 11648355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.