128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16255422)
1. Evaluation of achievable registration accuracy of the femur during minimally invasive total hip replacement.
Popescu FC; Viceconti M; Traina F; Toni A
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2005 Jul; 43(4):421-30. PubMed ID: 16255422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive registration for computer-assisted orthopedic surgery: combining tracked ultrasound and bone surface points via the P-IMLOP algorithm.
Billings S; Kang HJ; Cheng A; Boctor E; Kazanzides P; Taylor R
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Jun; 10(6):761-71. PubMed ID: 25895079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A bounded iterative closest point method for minimally invasive registration of the femur.
Rodriguez y Baena F; Hawke T; Jakopec M
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Oct; 227(10):1135-44. PubMed ID: 23959859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new navigation system for minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.
Yokoyama Y; Abe N; Fujiwara K; Suzuki M; Nakajima Y; Sugita N; Mitsuishi M; Nakashima Y; Ozaki T
Acta Med Okayama; 2013; 67(6):351-8. PubMed ID: 24356719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Native femoral anteversion should not be used as reference in cementless total hip arthroplasty with a straight, tapered stem: a retrospective clinical study.
Worlicek M; Weber M; Craiovan B; Wörner M; Völlner F; Springorum HR; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Sep; 17():399. PubMed ID: 27646313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance for accurate computer-assisted minimally invasive hip resurfacing surgery.
Barrett AR; Davies BL; Gomes MP; Harris SJ; Henckel J; Jakopec M; Rodriguez y Baena FM; Cobb JP
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Oct; 220(7):759-73. PubMed ID: 17117765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Even the Intraoperative Knowledge of Femoral Stem Anteversion Cannot Prevent Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Weber M; Woerner ML; Sendtner E; Völlner F; Grifka J; Renkawitz TF
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2514-2519. PubMed ID: 27236745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual intraoperative estimation of range of motion is misleading in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.
Woerner M; Weber M; Sendtner E; Springorum R; Worlicek M; Craiovan B; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Jul; 136(7):1015-20. PubMed ID: 27236583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional planning-guided total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive direct anterior approach. Clinical outcomes at five years' follow-up.
Sariali E; Catonne Y; Pascal-Moussellard H
Int Orthop; 2017 Apr; 41(4):699-705. PubMed ID: 27312191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Self-calibrating 3D-ultrasound-based bone registration for minimally invasive orthopedic surgery.
Barratt DC; Penney GP; Chan CS; Slomczykowski M; Carter TJ; Edwards PJ; Hawkes DJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Mar; 25(3):312-23. PubMed ID: 16524087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring leg length and offset with an imageless navigation system during total hip arthroplasty: is it really accurate?
Renkawitz T; Schuster T; Herold T; Goessmann H; Sendtner E; Grifka J; Kalteis T
Int J Med Robot; 2009 Jun; 5(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 19253907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A-mode ultrasound-based intra-femoral bone cement detection and 3D reconstruction in RTHR.
Heger S; Mumme T; Sellei R; De La Fuente M; Wirtz DC; Radermacher K
Comput Aided Surg; 2007 May; 12(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 17538789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Image-guided techniques improve accuracy of mosaic arthroplasty.
Sebastyan S; Kunz M; Stewart AJ; Bardana DD
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Feb; 11(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 26148693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Providing visual information to validate 2-D to 3-D registration.
Guézic A; Wu K; Kalvin A; Williamson B; Kazanzides P; Van Vorhis R
Med Image Anal; 2000 Dec; 4(4):357-74. PubMed ID: 11154022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Femoral pinless length and offset measurements during computer-assisted, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.
Renkawitz T; Sendtner E; Schuster T; Weber M; Grifka J; Woerner M
J Arthroplasty; 2014 May; 29(5):1021-5. PubMed ID: 24269098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fluoroscopy-based 3-D reconstruction of femoral bone cement: a new approach for revision total hip replacement.
de la Fuente M; Ohnsorge JA; Schkommodau E; Jetzki S; Wirtz DC; Radermacher K
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Apr; 52(4):664-75. PubMed ID: 15825868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Visual user guidance for registration based on A-mode ultrasound].
Heger S; Portheine F; Ohnsorge J; Radermacher K
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002; 47 Suppl 1 Pt 1():61-4. PubMed ID: 12451773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoperative application of hand-held structured light scanning: a feasibility study.
Chan B; Auyeung J; Rudan JF; Ellis RE; Kunz M
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jun; 11(6):1101-8. PubMed ID: 27017498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A multi-modality tracking, navigation and calibration for a flexible robotic drill system for total hip arthroplasty.
Ahmad Fuad ANB; Deep K; Yao W
Int J Med Robot; 2018 Feb; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 29230932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intra-operative digital imaging: assuring the alignment of components when undertaking total hip arthroplasty.
Hambright D; Hellman M; Barrack R
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1 Supple A):36-43. PubMed ID: 29292338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
