These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16255425)
1. Stroke volume equation for impedance cardiography. Bernstein DP; Lemmens HJ Med Biol Eng Comput; 2005 Jul; 43(4):443-50. PubMed ID: 16255425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impedance cardiography in healthy children and children with congenital heart disease: Improving stroke volume assessment. Nederend I; Ten Harkel ADJ; Blom NA; Berntson GG; de Geus EJC Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Oct; 120():136-147. PubMed ID: 28778397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impedance cardiography: the next vital sign technology? Van De Water JM; Miller TW; Vogel RL; Mount BE; Dalton ML Chest; 2003 Jun; 123(6):2028-33. PubMed ID: 12796185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impedance cardiography. Importance of the equation and the electrode configuration. van der Meer BJ; Woltjer HH; Sousman AM; Schreuder WO; Bulder ER; Huybregts MA; de Vries PM Intensive Care Med; 1996 Oct; 22(10):1120-4. PubMed ID: 8923081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of weight on stroke volume determination by means of impedance cardiography in cardiac surgery patients. Woltjer HH; Bogaard HJ; van der Spoel HI; de Vries PM Intensive Care Med; 1996 Aug; 22(8):766-71. PubMed ID: 8880245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standardization of non-invasive impedance cardiography for assessment of stroke volume: comparison with thermodilution. Woltjer HH; Bogaard HJ; Scheffer GJ; van der Spoel HI; Huybregts MA; de Vries PM Br J Anaesth; 1996 Dec; 77(6):748-52. PubMed ID: 9014628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of stroke volume and cardiac output by electrical interrogation of the brachial artery in normals: assessment of strengths, limitations, and sources of error. Bernstein DP; Henry IC; Lemmens HJ; Chaltas JL; DeMaria AN; Moon JB; Kahn AM J Clin Monit Comput; 2015 Dec; 29(6):789-800. PubMed ID: 25682204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a new advanced thoracic bioimpedance device for estimation of cardiac output. Haryadi DG; Westenskow DR; Critchley LA; Schookin SI; Zubenko VG; Beliaev KR; Morozov AA J Clin Monit Comput; 1999 Feb; 15(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 12578087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Whole-body impedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output. Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Turjanmaa VM; Uusitalo AJ Crit Care Med; 1997 May; 25(5):779-85. PubMed ID: 9187596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Ability of esCCO and ECOM Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output During Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver After Cardiac Surgery: A Comparison with the Pulmonary Thermodilution Method. Thonnerieux M; Alexander B; Binet C; Obadia JF; Bastien O; Desebbe O Anesth Analg; 2015 Aug; 121(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 25902321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stroke volume measurement during supine and upright cycle exercise by impedance cardiography. Moon JK; Coggan AR; Hopper MK; Baker LE; Coyle EF Ann Biomed Eng; 1994; 22(5):514-23. PubMed ID: 7825753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Continuous non-invasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac index in infants and children: comparison of Impedance Cardiography NICaS® vs CardioQ® method. Beck R; Milella L; Labellarte C Clin Ter; 2018; 169(3):e110-e113. PubMed ID: 29938742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cardiac output by impedance cardiography: two alternative methodologies compared with thermodilution. Sherwood A; Carter LS; Murphy CA Aviat Space Environ Med; 1991 Feb; 62(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 2001207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]