These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16255575)

  • 1. Fabrication and analysis of spatially uniform field electrokinetic flow devices: theory and experiment.
    Skulan AJ; Barrett LM; Singh AK; Cummings EB; Fiechtner GJ
    Anal Chem; 2005 Nov; 77(21):6790-7. PubMed ID: 16255575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhancement of electrokinetically driven microfluidic T-mixer using frequency modulated electric field and channel geometry effects.
    Yan D; Yang C; Miao J; Lam Y; Huang X
    Electrophoresis; 2009 Sep; 30(18):3144-52. PubMed ID: 19764063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Charge-based particle separation in microfluidic devices using combined hydrodynamic and electrokinetic effects.
    Jellema LC; Mey T; Koster S; Verpoorte E
    Lab Chip; 2009 Jul; 9(13):1914-25. PubMed ID: 19532967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fabrication and validation of a multi-channel type microfluidic chip for electrokinetic streaming potential devices.
    Chun MS; Shim MS; Choi NW
    Lab Chip; 2006 Feb; 6(2):302-9. PubMed ID: 16450042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample flow switching techniques on microfluidic chips.
    Pan YJ; Lin JJ; Luo WJ; Yang RJ
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2006 Feb; 21(8):1644-8. PubMed ID: 16112854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of channel position on sample confinement in two-dimensional planar microfluidic devices.
    Lerch MA; Hoffman MD; Jacobson SC
    Lab Chip; 2008 Feb; 8(2):316-22. PubMed ID: 18231672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Numerical and experimental evaluation of microfluidic sorting devices.
    Taylor JK; Ren CL; Stubley GD
    Biotechnol Prog; 2008; 24(4):981-91. PubMed ID: 19194907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation of the effects of inlet channel geometry on electrokinetic instabilities.
    Pan YJ; Yang RJ
    Biomed Microdevices; 2009 Feb; 11(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 18819007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated electric valve for electrokinetic separation in a networked microfluidic chip.
    Cui H; Huang Z; Dutta P; Ivory CF
    Anal Chem; 2007 Feb; 79(4):1456-65. PubMed ID: 17297944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial confinement of ultrasonic force fields in microfluidic channels.
    Manneberg O; Melker Hagsäter S; Svennebring J; Hertz HM; Kutter JP; Bruus H; Wiklund M
    Ultrasonics; 2009 Jan; 49(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 18701122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Organic plasma process for simple and substrate-independent surface modification of polymeric BioMEMS devices.
    Hiratsuka A; Muguruma H; Lee KH; Karube I
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2004 Jul; 19(12):1667-72. PubMed ID: 15142601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dielectrophoretic manipulation of particles and cells using insulating ridges in faceted prism microchannels.
    Barrett LM; Skulan AJ; Singh AK; Cummings EB; Fiechtner GJ
    Anal Chem; 2005 Nov; 77(21):6798-804. PubMed ID: 16255576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electroosmotic mixing in microchannels.
    Glasgow I; Batton J; Aubry N
    Lab Chip; 2004 Dec; 4(6):558-62. PubMed ID: 15570365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrokinetic fluid control in two-dimensional planar microfluidic devices.
    Lerch MA; Jacobson SC
    Anal Chem; 2007 Oct; 79(19):7485-91. PubMed ID: 17718538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AC electro-osmotic mixing induced by non-contact external electrodes.
    Wang SC; Chen HP; Lee CY; Yu CC; Chang HC
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2006 Oct; 22(4):563-7. PubMed ID: 16837182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrokinetic transport in nanochannels. 2. Experiments.
    Pennathur S; Santiago JG
    Anal Chem; 2005 Nov; 77(21):6782-9. PubMed ID: 16255574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Titanium-based dielectrophoresis devices for microfluidic applications.
    Zhang YT; Bottausci F; Rao MP; Parker ER; Mezic I; Macdonald NC
    Biomed Microdevices; 2008 Aug; 10(4):509-17. PubMed ID: 18214682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel microfluidic driver via AC electrokinetics.
    Kuo CT; Liu CH
    Lab Chip; 2008 May; 8(5):725-33. PubMed ID: 18432342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Macro-to-micro interfaces for microfluidic devices.
    Fredrickson CK; Fan ZH
    Lab Chip; 2004 Dec; 4(6):526-33. PubMed ID: 15570361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of electrical field-induced flow reversal in a microchannel.
    Pirat C; Naso A; van der Wouden EJ; Gardeniers JG; Lohse D; van den Berg A
    Lab Chip; 2008 Jun; 8(6):945-9. PubMed ID: 18497916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.