These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16256374)

  • 1. Receptive field size-dependent attention effects in simultaneously presented stimulus displays.
    Bles M; Schwarzbach J; De Weerd P; Goebel R; Jansma BM
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(2):506-11. PubMed ID: 16256374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modulation of sensory suppression: implications for receptive field sizes in the human visual cortex.
    Kastner S; De Weerd P; Pinsk MA; Elizondo MI; Desimone R; Ungerleider LG
    J Neurophysiol; 2001 Sep; 86(3):1398-411. PubMed ID: 11535686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Activation patterns in visual cortex reveal receptive field size-dependent attentional modulation.
    Rijpkema M; van Aalderen SI; Schwarzbach JV; Verstraten FA
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():90-6. PubMed ID: 18062939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attending to multiple visual streams: interactions between location-based and category-based attentional selection.
    Fagioli S; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1628-41. PubMed ID: 18823252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanisms of feature- and space-based attention: response modulation and baseline increases.
    McMains SA; Fehd HM; Emmanouil TA; Kastner S
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 98(4):2110-21. PubMed ID: 17671104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex.
    Luck SJ; Chelazzi L; Hillyard SA; Desimone R
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jan; 77(1):24-42. PubMed ID: 9120566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual load modifies processing of unattended stimuli both in the presence and absence of attended stimuli.
    Couperus JW
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Nov; 485(3):246-50. PubMed ID: 20849914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. V4 receptive field dynamics as predicted by a systems-level model of visual attention using feedback from the frontal eye field.
    Hamker FH; Zirnsak M
    Neural Netw; 2006 Nov; 19(9):1371-82. PubMed ID: 17014990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retinotopic effects during spatial audio-visual integration.
    Meienbrock A; Naumer MJ; Doehrmann O; Singer W; Muckli L
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):531-9. PubMed ID: 16797610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial attention can modulate audiovisual integration at multiple cortical and subcortical sites.
    Fairhall SL; Macaluso E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 29(6):1247-57. PubMed ID: 19302160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural mechanisms of spatial- and feature-based attention: a quantitative analysis.
    Stoppel CM; Boehler CN; Sabelhaus C; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM; Schoenfeld MA
    Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 1181():51-60. PubMed ID: 17961522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Push-pull mechanism of selective attention in human extrastriate cortex.
    Pinsk MA; Doniger GM; Kastner S
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 92(1):622-9. PubMed ID: 14973320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic shifts of visual receptive fields in cortical area MT by spatial attention.
    Womelsdorf T; Anton-Erxleben K; Pieper F; Treue S
    Nat Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 9(9):1156-60. PubMed ID: 16906153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Split of attentional resources in human visual cortex.
    Morawetz C; Holz P; Baudewig J; Treue S; Dechent P
    Vis Neurosci; 2007; 24(6):817-26. PubMed ID: 18093369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Top-down biases win against focal attention in the fusiform face area.
    Reddy L; Moradi F; Koch C
    Neuroimage; 2007 Dec; 38(4):730-9. PubMed ID: 17904388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Orienting and maintenance of spatial attention in audition and vision: an event-related brain potential study.
    Salmi J; Rinne T; Degerman A; Alho K
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 25(12):3725-33. PubMed ID: 17610592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of feature and spatial attention on visual change detection.
    Kimura M; Katayama J; Murohashi H
    Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):389-92. PubMed ID: 18303587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Topography of attention in the primary visual cortex.
    Simola J; Stenbacka L; Vanni S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 29(1):188-96. PubMed ID: 19087165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving residual vision by attentional cueing in patients with brain lesions.
    Poggel DA; Kasten E; Müller-Oehring EM; Bunzenthal U; Sabel BA
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 16777076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.