BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16257848)

  • 1. Investigations of clofibrate in alternative carcinogenicity models.
    Santostefano MJ; Hoivik DJ; Miller RT
    Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24(5):285-8. PubMed ID: 16257848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the carcinogenic potential of clofibrate in the rasH2 mouse.
    Nesfield SR; Clarke CJ; Hoivik DJ; Miller RT; Allen JS; Selinger K; Santostefano MJ
    Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24(5):301-11. PubMed ID: 16257850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the carcinogenic potential of clofibrate in the FVB/Tg.AC mouse after oral administration--part I.
    Torrey CE; Wall HG; Campbell JA; Kwanyuen P; Hoivik DJ; Miller RT; Allen JS; Jayo MJ; Selinger K; Savina PM; Santostefano MJ
    Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24(5):313-25. PubMed ID: 16257851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the carcinogenic potential of clofibrate in the neonatal mouse.
    Nesfield SR; Williams TC; Hoivik DJ; Miller RT; Allen JS; Selinger K; Rickert D; Santostefano MJ
    Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24(5):341-8. PubMed ID: 16257853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the carcinogenic potential of clofibrate in the p53+/- mouse.
    Torrey CE; Campbell JA; Hoivik DJ; Miller RT; Allen JS; Mann PC; Selinger K; Rickert D; Savina PM; Santostefano MJ
    Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24(5):289-99. PubMed ID: 16257849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the carcinogenic potential of clofibrate in the FVB/Tg.AC mouse after dermal application--part II.
    Torrey CE; Wall HG; Campbell JA; Kwanyuen P; Hoivik DJ; Miller RT; Allen JS; Jayo MJ; Selinger K; Santostefano MJ
    Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24(5):327-39. PubMed ID: 16257852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetically altered mouse models for identifying carcinogens.
    Tennant RW; Stasiewicz S; Mennear J; French JE; Spalding JW
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):123-50. PubMed ID: 10353386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of genetically modified mouse models for evaluation of carcinogenic risk: considerations for the laboratory animal scientist.
    Recio L; Everitt J
    Comp Med; 2001 Oct; 51(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 11924798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hepatic drug metabolizing enzymes induced by clofibrate in rasH2 mice.
    Katsutani N; Sekido T; Aoki T; Sagami F
    Toxicol Lett; 2000 Jun; 115(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 10814892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transcription profiling distinguishes dose-dependent effects in the livers of rats treated with clofibrate.
    Kramer JA; Blomme EA; Bunch RT; Davila JC; Jackson CJ; Jones PF; Kolaja KL; Curtiss SW
    Toxicol Pathol; 2003; 31(4):417-31. PubMed ID: 12851107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The transgenic mouse assay as an alternative test method for regulatory carcinogenicity studies--implications for REACH.
    Wells MY; Williams ES
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Mar; 53(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 19126422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Studies evaluating the utility of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea as a positive control in carcinogenicity studies in the p53+/- mouse.
    Hoivik DJ; Allen JS; Wall HG; Nold JB; Miller RT; Santostefano MJ
    Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24(5):349-56. PubMed ID: 16257854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The use of biotechnological recombinant-mice in biological safety research].
    Inoue T
    Eisei Shikenjo Hokoku; 1996; (114):1-12. PubMed ID: 9037857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alternative mouse models for carcinogenicity assessment: industry use and issues with pathology interpretation.
    Long GG; Morton D; Peters T; Short B; Skydsgaard M
    Toxicol Pathol; 2010 Jan; 38(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 19915137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Usefulness of transgenic mice in carcinogenicity tests].
    Hayashi Y; Kodama Y; Fuji S
    Jikken Dobutsu; 1993 Jul; 42(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 8354349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long- and medium-term carcinogenicity studies in animals and short-term genotoxicity tests.
    Feron VJ; Schwarz M; Hemminki K; Krewski D
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (131):103-29. PubMed ID: 10505295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The utility of the K6/ODC transgenic mouse as an alternative short term dermal model for carcinogenicity testing of pharmaceuticals.
    Miller TJ; Honchel R; Espandiari P; Knapton A; Zhang J; Sistare FD; Hanig JP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Feb; 50(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 18069108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consideration of short-term carcinogenicity tests using transgenic mouse models.
    Blain PG; Battershill JM; Venitt S; Cooper CC; Fielder RJ
    Mutat Res; 1998 Jul; 403(1-2):259-63. PubMed ID: 9726026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Panel discussion: alternative mouse models for carcinogenicity assessment.
    French JE; Leblanc B; Long GG; Morton D; Storer R; Leighton J; Swenberg J; Tsuda H
    Toxicol Pathol; 2010 Jan; 38(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 19884653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of genetically modified animals in carcinogenicity bioassays.
    Maronpot RR
    Toxicol Pathol; 2000; 28(3):450-3. PubMed ID: 10862565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.