BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16259048)

  • 21. The death of cost-minimization analysis?
    Briggs AH; O'Brien BJ
    Health Econ; 2001 Mar; 10(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 11252048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessing the costs, benefits, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit of psychological assessment: we should, we can, and here's how.
    Yates BT; Taub J
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Dec; 15(4):478-95. PubMed ID: 14692844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Risk aversion and uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis: the expected-utility, moment-generating function approach.
    Elbasha EH
    Health Econ; 2005 May; 14(5):457-70. PubMed ID: 15386661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Addressing risk preferences in cost-effectiveness analyses.
    Zivin JG; Bridges JF
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2002; 1(3):135-9. PubMed ID: 14619264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Using covariates to reduce uncertainty in the economic evaluation of clinical trial data.
    Vázquez-Polo FJ; Negrín Hernández MA; López-Valcárcel BG
    Health Econ; 2005 Jun; 14(6):545-57. PubMed ID: 15497202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves--caveats quantified.
    Jakubczyk M; Kamiński B
    Health Econ; 2010 Aug; 19(8):955-63. PubMed ID: 19688780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Bayesian approach for the cost-effectiveness evaluation of healthcare technologies].
    Berchialla P; Gregori D; Brunello F; Veltri A; Petrinco M; Pagano E
    Epidemiol Prev; 2009; 33(3):123-8. PubMed ID: 19776461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Bayesian approach to stochastic cost-effectiveness analysis. An illustration and application to blood pressure control in type 2 diabetes.
    Briggs AH
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2001; 17(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 11329846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Thinking outside the box: recent advances in the analysis and presentation of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness studies.
    Briggs AH; O'Brien BJ; Blackhouse G
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2002; 23():377-401. PubMed ID: 11910068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Advantages of using the net-benefit approach for analysing uncertainty in economic evaluation studies.
    Zethraeus N; Johannesson M; Jönsson B; Löthgren M; Tambour M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2003; 21(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 12484802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A framework for cost-effectiveness analysis from clinical trial data.
    O'Hagan A; Stevens JW
    Health Econ; 2001 Jun; 10(4):303-15. PubMed ID: 11400253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Bayesian approach to stochastic cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Briggs AH
    Health Econ; 1999 May; 8(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 10348420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Methods for incorporating covariate adjustment, subgroup analysis and between-centre differences into cost-effectiveness evaluations.
    Nixon RM; Thompson SG
    Health Econ; 2005 Dec; 14(12):1217-29. PubMed ID: 15945043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can we justify the cost of echocardiography? Lessons from outcomes research.
    Marwick TH
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2005 Jun; 6(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 15894234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Avoiding research waste through cost-effectiveness analysis: the example of medication adherence-enhancing interventions.
    Gandjour A
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2015 Feb; 15(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 24910291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Inference for the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve and cost-effectiveness ratio.
    O'Hagan A; Stevens JW; Montmartin J
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2000 Apr; 17(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 10947489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Treatment effectiveness score as an outcome measure in clinical trials.
    Ling W; Shoptaw S; Wesson D; Rawson RA; Compton M; Klett CJ
    NIDA Res Monogr; 1997; 175():208-20. PubMed ID: 9467800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Monitoring gas exchange: clinical effectiveness and cost considerations.
    Durbin CG
    Respir Care; 1994 Feb; 39(2):123-37. PubMed ID: 10145962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves--facts, fallacies and frequently asked questions.
    Fenwick E; O'Brien BJ; Briggs A
    Health Econ; 2004 May; 13(5):405-15. PubMed ID: 15127421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bayesian sample size determination for cost-effectiveness studies with censored data.
    Beavers DP; Stamey JD
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190422. PubMed ID: 29304143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.