239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16259627)
1. The Oxford hip score: the patient's perspective.
Wylde V; Learmonth ID; Cavendish VJ
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2005 Oct; 3():66. PubMed ID: 16259627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties--a comparison between the Harris hip score and the Oxford hip score.
Kalairajah Y; Azurza K; Hulme C; Molloy S; Drabu KJ
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Dec; 20(8):1037-41. PubMed ID: 16376260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Arthroplasty Candidacy Help Engine tool to select candidates for hip and knee replacement surgery: development and economic modelling.
Price A; Smith J; Dakin H; Kang S; Eibich P; Cook J; Gray A; Harris K; Middleton R; Gibbons E; Benedetto E; Smith S; Dawson J; Fitzpatrick R; Sayers A; Miller L; Marques E; Gooberman-Hill R; Blom A; Judge A; Arden N; Murray D; Glyn-Jones S; Barker K; Carr A; Beard D
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(32):1-216. PubMed ID: 31287051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An assessment of the impact of behavioural cognitions on function in patients partaking in a trial of early home-based progressive resistance training after total hip replacement surgery.
Okoro T; Morrison V; Maddison P; Lemmey AB; Andrew JG
Disabil Rehabil; 2013; 35(23):2000-7. PubMed ID: 23480673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcome assessment in the elderly after total hip arthroplasty.
Wood GC; McLauchlan GJ
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Apr; 21(3):398-404. PubMed ID: 16627149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing alternative Rasch-based methods vs raw scores in measuring change in health.
Norquist JM; Fitzpatrick R; Dawson J; Jenkinson C
Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1 Suppl):I25-36. PubMed ID: 14707753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient expectations of arthroplasty of the hip and knee.
Scott CE; Bugler KE; Clement ND; MacDonald D; Howie CR; Biant LC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jul; 94(7):974-81. PubMed ID: 22733956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictors of quality of life outcomes after revision total hip replacement.
Biring GS; Masri BA; Greidanus NV; Duncan CP; Garbuz DS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Nov; 89(11):1446-51. PubMed ID: 17998179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A patient's perspective on multidisciplinary treatment gain for fibromyalgia: an indicator for pre-post treatment effects?
van Koulil S; Kraaimaat FW; van Lankveld W; van Riel PL; Evers AW
Arthritis Rheum; 2009 Dec; 61(12):1626-32. PubMed ID: 19950305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recovery of physical function and patient's satisfaction after total hip replacement (THR) surgery supported by a tailored guide-book.
Fortina M; Carta S; Gambera D; Crainz E; Ferrata P; Maniscalco P
Acta Biomed; 2005 Dec; 76(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 16676564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient-reported outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty: comparison of midterm results.
Wylde V; Blom AW; Whitehouse SL; Taylor AH; Pattison GT; Bannister GC
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Feb; 24(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 18534427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of self-assessment outcome questionnaires: patient-physician discrepancy in outcome interpretation.
Ragab AA
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2003; 39():579-84. PubMed ID: 12724955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Quality of life assessment one year after total hip or knee arthroplasty].
Mainard D; Guillemin F; Cuny C; Mejat-Adler E; Galois L; Delagoutte J
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86(5):464-73. PubMed ID: 10970970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The evaluation of the influence of total hip replacement on health-related quality of life].
Rocławski M; Lorczyńiski A; Bieniecki M
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2008; 73(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 18683524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the underlying constructs of the EQ-5D and Oxford Hip Score: implications for mapping.
Oppe M; Devlin N; Black N
Value Health; 2011; 14(6):884-91. PubMed ID: 21914510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patients' outcome after total hip arthroplasty: a comparison between the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities index and the Oxford 12-item hip score.
Garbuz DS; Xu M; Sayre EC
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Oct; 21(7):998-1004. PubMed ID: 17027542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term patient-reported outcomes after total hip replacement: comparison to the general population.
Gould VC; Blom AW; Wylde V
Hip Int; 2012; 22(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 22547380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An analysis of Oxford hip and knee scores following primary hip and knee replacement performed at a specialist centre.
Matharu GS; McBryde CW; Robb CA; Pynsent PB
Bone Joint J; 2014 Jul; 96-B(7):928-35. PubMed ID: 24986947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A patient's recollection of pre-operative status is not accurate one year after arthroplasty of the hip or knee.
Murphy MT; Vardi R; Journeaux SF; Whitehouse SL
Bone Joint J; 2015 Aug; 97-B(8):1070-5. PubMed ID: 26224823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
