321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16259639)
1. Assessment of pulse rate variability by the method of pulse frequency demodulation.
Hayano J; Barros AK; Kamiya A; Ohte N; Yasuma F
Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Nov; 4():62. PubMed ID: 16259639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of three methods for beat-to-beat-interval extraction from continuous blood pressure and electrocardiogram with respect to heart rate variability analysis.
Suhrbier A; Heringer R; Walther T; Malberg H; Wessel N
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2006 Jul; 51(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 16915768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Limitations of oximetry to measure heart rate variability measures.
Lu G; Yang F
Cardiovasc Eng; 2009 Sep; 9(3):119-25. PubMed ID: 19728090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of pulse rate variability obtained by the pulse onsets of the photoplethysmographic signal.
Posada-Quintero HF; Delisle-Rodríguez D; Cuadra-Sanz MB; Fernández de la Vara-Prieto RR
Physiol Meas; 2013 Feb; 34(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 23348575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Continuous and online analysis of heart rate variability.
Chan HL; Chou WS; Chen SW; Fang SC; Liou CS; Hwang YS
J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(5):227-34. PubMed ID: 16126583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Heart instantaneous frequency (HIF): an alternative approach to extract heart rate variability.
Barros AK; Ohnishi N
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Aug; 48(8):850-5. PubMed ID: 11499522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of heart rate variability during alterations in stress: complex demodulation vs. spectral analysis.
Wilhelm FH; Grossman P; Roth WT
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2005; 41():346-51. PubMed ID: 15850130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of noise on T-wave alternans measurement in ambulatory ECGs using modified moving average versus spectral method.
Selvaraj RJ; Chauhan VS
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 May; 32(5):632-41. PubMed ID: 19422585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal fiducial points for pulse rate variability analysis from forehead and finger photoplethysmographic signals.
Peralta E; Lazaro J; Bailon R; Marozas V; Gil E
Physiol Meas; 2019 Feb; 40(2):025007. PubMed ID: 30669123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sampling frequency of the RR interval time series for spectral analysis of heart rate variability.
Singh D; Vinod K; Saxena SC
J Med Eng Technol; 2004; 28(6):263-72. PubMed ID: 15513744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection method to minimize variability in photoplethysmographic signals for timing-related measurement.
Foo JY; Wilson SJ
J Med Eng Technol; 2006; 30(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 16531348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An improved windowing technique for heart rate variability power spectrum estimation.
Singh D; Vinod K; Saxena SC; Deepak KK
J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 15804859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of pulse rate variability as a surrogate for heart rate variability in chronically instrumented rabbits.
Pellegrino PR; Schiller AM; Zucker IH
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2014 Jul; 307(1):H97-109. PubMed ID: 24791786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time-varying analysis of heart rate variability signals with a Kalman smoother algorithm.
Tarvainen MP; Georgiadis SD; Ranta-Aho PO; Karjalainen PA
Physiol Meas; 2006 Mar; 27(3):225-39. PubMed ID: 16462010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Heart rate variability on 7-day Holter monitoring using a bootstrap rhythmometric procedure.
Goya-Esteban R; Mora-Jiménez I; Rojo-Alvarez JL; Barquero-Pérez O; Pastor-Pérez FJ; Manzano-Fernández S; Pascual-Figal DA; García-Alberola A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Jun; 57(6):1366-76. PubMed ID: 20172786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Traditional and nonlinear heart rate variability are each independently associated with mortality after myocardial infarction.
Stein PK; Domitrovich PP; Huikuri HV; Kleiger RE;
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2005 Jan; 16(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 15673380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonlinear heart rate variability: a better ECG predictor of cardiovascular risk?
Anderson JL; Horne BD
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2005 Jan; 16(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 15673381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Structural relationships between measures based on heart beat intervals: potential for improved risk assessment.
Hallstrom AP; Stein PK; Schneider R; Hodges M; Schmidt G; Ulm K
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Aug; 51(8):1414-20. PubMed ID: 15311827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. QT variability and HRV interactions in ECG: quantification and reliability.
Almeida R; Gouveia S; Rocha AP; Pueyo E; Martínez JP; Laguna P
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 53(7):1317-29. PubMed ID: 16830936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of foot finding methods for deriving instantaneous pulse rates from photoplethysmographic signals.
Hemon MC; Phillips JP
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Apr; 30(2):157-68. PubMed ID: 25902897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
