BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1828 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16260056)

  • 1. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
    Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
    Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Significant improvement in normal tissue sparing and target coverage for head and neck cancer by means of helical tomotherapy.
    Fiorino C; Dell'Oca I; Pierelli A; Broggi S; De Martin E; Di Muzio N; Longobardi B; Fazio F; Calandrino R
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 16546279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Helical tomotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: dosimetric comparison with linear accelerator-based step-and-shoot IMRT.
    Murthy V; Master Z; Gupta T; Ghosh-Laskar S; Budrukkar A; Phurailatpam R; Agarwal J
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2010; 6(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 20622367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preservation of oral health-related quality of life and salivary flow rates after inverse-planned intensity- modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head-and-neck cancer.
    Parliament MB; Scrimger RA; Anderson SG; Kurien EC; Thompson HK; Field GC; Hanson J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Mar; 58(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 14967418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
    Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
    Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
    Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for carcinomas of the oro-pharynx, hypo-pharynx and larynx: a treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT.
    Vanetti E; Clivio A; Nicolini G; Fogliata A; Ghosh-Laskar S; Agarwal JP; Upreti RR; Budrukkar A; Murthy V; Deshpande DD; Shrivastava SK; Dinshaw KA; Cozzi L
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jul; 92(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 19157609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas: II--clinical results.
    Lauve A; Morris M; Schmidt-Ullrich R; Wu Q; Mohan R; Abayomi O; Buck D; Holdford D; Dawson K; Dinardo L; Reiter E
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Oct; 60(2):374-87. PubMed ID: 15380569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of intensity-modulated radiation therapy as a boost treatment on the lung-dose distributions for non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Choi Y; Kim JK; Lee HS; Hur WJ; Chai GY; Kang KM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Nov; 63(3):683-9. PubMed ID: 15927412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraindividual comparison of conventional three-dimensional radiotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy in the therapy of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer a planning study.
    Marnitz S; Stuschke M; Bohsung J; Moys A; Reng I; Wurm R; Budach V
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2002 Nov; 178(11):651-8. PubMed ID: 12426677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy improves target coverage, spinal cord sparing and allows dose escalation in patients with locally advanced cancer of the larynx.
    Clark CH; Bidmead AM; Mubata CD; Harrington KJ; Nutting CM
    Radiother Oncol; 2004 Feb; 70(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 15028407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic intensity-modulated non-coplanar arc radiotherapy (INCA) for head and neck cancer.
    Krayenbuehl J; Davis JB; Ciernik IF
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Nov; 81(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 17055095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) for nasopharynx cancer with helical tomotherapy. A planning study.
    Fiorino C; Dell'Oca I; Pierelli A; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Chiara A; De Martin E; Di Muzio N; Fazio F; Calandrino R
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Sep; 183(9):497-505. PubMed ID: 17762924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate.
    Luxton G; Hancock SL; Boyer AL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 15093924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing the risk of xerostomia and mandibular osteoradionecrosis: the potential benefits of intensity modulated radiotherapy in advanced oral cavity carcinoma.
    Ahmed M; Hansen VN; Harrington KJ; Nutting CM
    Med Dosim; 2009; 34(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 19647632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: an IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors.
    Hein PA; Gladstone DJ; Bellerive MR; Hug EB
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 16029816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dosimetric comparison between 3DCRT and IMRT using different multileaf collimators in the treatment of brain tumors.
    Ding M; Newman F; Chen C; Stuhr K; Gaspar LE
    Med Dosim; 2009; 34(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 19181248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of direct machine parameter optimization versus fluence optimization with sequential sequencing in IMRT of hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Dobler B; Pohl F; Bogner L; Koelbl O
    Radiat Oncol; 2007 Sep; 2():33. PubMed ID: 17822529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of IMRT planning with two-step and one-step optimization: a strategy for improving therapeutic gain and reducing the integral dose.
    Abate A; Pressello MC; Benassi M; Strigari L
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(23):7183-98. PubMed ID: 19920309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 92.