BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16260161)

  • 1. Classification and comparison of ligand-binding sites derived from grid-mapped knowledge-based potentials.
    Hoppe C; Steinbeck C; Wohlfahrt G
    J Mol Graph Model; 2006 Mar; 24(5):328-40. PubMed ID: 16260161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Field-based comparison of ligand and coactivator binding sites of nuclear receptors.
    Wohlfahrt G; Sipilä J; Pietilä LO
    Biopolymers; 2009 Oct; 91(10):884-94. PubMed ID: 19582836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SuperStar: improved knowledge-based interaction fields for protein binding sites.
    Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Watson P; Gillet V; Willett P
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Mar; 307(3):841-59. PubMed ID: 11273705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A common reference framework for analyzing/comparing proteins and ligands. Fingerprints for Ligands and Proteins (FLAP): theory and application.
    Baroni M; Cruciani G; Sciabola S; Perruccio F; Mason JS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):279-94. PubMed ID: 17381166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A family-based approach reveals the function of residues in the nuclear receptor ligand-binding domain.
    Folkertsma S; van Noort P; Van Durme J; Joosten HJ; Bettler E; Fleuren W; Oliveira L; Horn F; de Vlieg J; Vriend G
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Aug; 341(2):321-35. PubMed ID: 15276826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-throughput virtual screening of proteins using GRID molecular interaction fields.
    Sciabola S; Stanton RV; Mills JE; Flocco MM; Baroni M; Cruciani G; Perruccio F; Mason JS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jan; 50(1):155-69. PubMed ID: 19919042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fold independent structural comparisons of protein-ligand binding sites for exploring functional relationships.
    Gold ND; Jackson RM
    J Mol Biol; 2006 Feb; 355(5):1112-24. PubMed ID: 16359705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comprehensive structural classification of ligand-binding motifs in proteins.
    Kinjo AR; Nakamura H
    Structure; 2009 Feb; 17(2):234-46. PubMed ID: 19217394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SCOWLP classification: structural comparison and analysis of protein binding regions.
    Teyra J; Paszkowski-Rogacz M; Anders G; Pisabarro MT
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 9():9. PubMed ID: 18182098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SitePrint: three-dimensional pharmacophore descriptors derived from protein binding sites for family based active site analysis, classification, and drug design.
    Arnold JR; Burdick KW; Pegg SC; Toba S; Lamb ML; Kuntz ID
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2190-8. PubMed ID: 15554689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are target-family-privileged substructures truly privileged?
    Schnur DM; Hermsmeier MA; Tebben AJ
    J Med Chem; 2006 Mar; 49(6):2000-9. PubMed ID: 16539387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New opportunities for protease ligand-binding site comparisons using SitesBase.
    Gold ND; Deville K; Jackson RM
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2007 Jun; 35(Pt 3):561-5. PubMed ID: 17511652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Form follows function: shape analysis of protein cavities for receptor-based drug design.
    Weisel M; Proschak E; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    Proteomics; 2009 Jan; 9(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 19142949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Architectural repertoire of ligand-binding pockets on protein surfaces.
    Weisel M; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    Chembiochem; 2010 Mar; 11(4):556-63. PubMed ID: 20069621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conformational adaptation of nuclear receptor ligand binding domains to agonists: potential for novel approaches to ligand design.
    Togashi M; Borngraeber S; Sandler B; Fletterick RJ; Webb P; Baxter JD
    J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol; 2005 Feb; 93(2-5):127-37. PubMed ID: 15860255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orphan nuclear receptors adopted by crystallography.
    Ingraham HA; Redinbo MR
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2005 Dec; 15(6):708-15. PubMed ID: 16263271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ligand-based approach to in silico pharmacology: nuclear receptor profiling.
    Mestres J; Martín-Couce L; Gregori-Puigjané E; Cases M; Boyer S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2725-36. PubMed ID: 17125212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PDBLIG: classification of small molecular protein binding in the Protein Data Bank.
    Chalk AJ; Worth CL; Overington JP; Chan AW
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jul; 47(15):3807-16. PubMed ID: 15239659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Locating and characterizing binding sites on proteins.
    Mattos C; Ringe D
    Nat Biotechnol; 1996 May; 14(5):595-9. PubMed ID: 9630949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A searchable database for comparing protein-ligand binding sites for the analysis of structure-function relationships.
    Gold ND; Jackson RM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):736-42. PubMed ID: 16563004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.