These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16260297)

  • 1. Nucleic acid recovery from complex environmental samples.
    Purdy KJ
    Methods Enzymol; 2005; 397():271-92. PubMed ID: 16260297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DNA extraction method affects microbial community profiles from soils and sediment.
    Carrigg C; Rice O; Kavanagh S; Collins G; O'Flaherty V
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Dec; 77(4):955-64. PubMed ID: 17960375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison of direct and indirect environmental DNA extraction methods for samples from a high-temperature environment].
    Liu HW; Peng Q; Li QY; Xiao W; Cui XL; Lin LB; Liu ZJ; Jiang CL; Xu LH; Chen YG; Wang ZG; Ren Z; Deng L; Wen ML
    Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2006 Dec; 46(6):1018-22. PubMed ID: 17302174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In situ analysis of native microbial communities in complex samples with high particulate loads.
    Barra Caracciolo A; Grenni P; Cupo C; Rossetti S
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2005 Dec; 253(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 16213678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of five commercial DNA extraction kits for the recovery of Francisella tularensis DNA from spiked soil samples.
    Whitehouse CA; Hottel HE
    Mol Cell Probes; 2007 Apr; 21(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 17011748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differentiation of genes extracted from non-viable versus viable micro-organisms in environmental samples using ethidium monoazide bromide.
    Pisz JM; Lawrence JR; Schafer AN; Siciliano SD
    J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Dec; 71(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 17963903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative analysis of environmental DNA extraction and purification methods from different humic acid-rich soils.
    Lakay FM; Botha A; Prior BA
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):265-73. PubMed ID: 17184343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Novel extraction strategy of ribosomal RNA and genomic DNA from cheese for PCR-based investigations.
    Bonaïti C; Parayre S; Irlinger F
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 107(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 16269194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of five commercial nucleic acid extraction kits for their ability to inactivate Bacillus anthracis spores and comparison of DNA yields from spores and spiked environmental samples.
    Dauphin LA; Moser BD; Bowen MD
    J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Jan; 76(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18824041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A microwave-based method for nucleic acid isolation from environmental samples.
    Orsini M; Romano-Spica V
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2001 Jul; 33(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 11442808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial and temporal variability in epilithic biofilm bacterial communities along an upland river gradient.
    Anderson-Glenna MJ; Bakkestuen V; Clipson NJ
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2008 Jun; 64(3):407-18. PubMed ID: 18397300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring microbial diversity in volcanic environments: a review of methods in DNA extraction.
    Herrera A; Cockell CS
    J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Jul; 70(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 17540467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of DNA extraction procedures for the detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans, the causative agent of Buruli ulcer, in clinical and environmental specimens.
    Durnez L; Stragier P; Roebben K; Ablordey A; Leirs H; Portaels F
    J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Feb; 76(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 18973778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expanded range of Burkholderia species in Australia.
    Levy A; Merritt AJ; Aravena-Roman M; Hodge MM; Inglis TJ
    Am J Trop Med Hyg; 2008 Apr; 78(4):599-604. PubMed ID: 18385355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improvements for comparative analysis of changes in diversity of microbial communities using internal standards in PCR-DGGE.
    Petersen DG; Dahllöf I
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2005 Aug; 53(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 16329953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of molecular techniques to characterize the microbial communities in contaminated soil and water.
    Malik S; Beer M; Megharaj M; Naidu R
    Environ Int; 2008 Feb; 34(2):265-76. PubMed ID: 18083233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DNA isolation from soil samples for cloning in different hosts.
    Kauffmann IM; Schmitt J; Schmid RD
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 64(5):665-70. PubMed ID: 14758515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simple and safe method for simultaneous isolation of microbial RNA and DNA from problematic populations.
    McIlroy S; Porter K; Seviour RJ; Tillett D
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 74(21):6806-7. PubMed ID: 18791011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acinetobacter diversity in environmental samples assessed by 16S rRNA gene PCR-DGGE fingerprinting.
    Vanbroekhoven K; Ryngaert A; Wattiau P; Mot R; Springael D
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2004 Oct; 50(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 19712375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bacterial communities in a crude oil gathering and transferring system (China).
    Liu YJ; Chen YP; Jin PK; Wang XC
    Anaerobe; 2009 Oct; 15(5):214-8. PubMed ID: 19351561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.