176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16260922)
1. Atazanavir/ritonavir versus lopinavir/ritonavir: equivalent or different efficacy profiles?
Hill A
AIDS; 2005 Nov; 19(17):2054-5. PubMed ID: 16260922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Response to "Atazanavir/ritonavir versus lopinavir/ritonavir: equivalent or different efficacy profiles?" by Hill.
Johnson M
AIDS; 2006 Oct; 20(15):1987. PubMed ID: 16988525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Atazanavir plus ritonavir or saquinavir, and lopinavir/ritonavir in patients experiencing multiple virological failures.
Johnson M; Grinsztejn B; Rodriguez C; Coco J; DeJesus E; Lazzarin A; Lichtenstein K; Rightmire A; Sankoh S; Wilber R
AIDS; 2005 Jan; 19(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 15668540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir compared with atazanavir in antiretroviral-naive patients: modelling the combined effects of HIV and heart disease.
Simpson KN; Luo MP; Chumney EC; King MS; Brun S
Clin Drug Investig; 2007; 27(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 17177581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir versus twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 48 week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE study.
Molina JM; Andrade-Villanueva J; Echevarria J; Chetchotisakd P; Corral J; David N; Moyle G; Mancini M; Percival L; Yang R; Thiry A; McGrath D;
Lancet; 2008 Aug; 372(9639):646-55. PubMed ID: 18722869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Insulin resistance in HIV-infected patients receiving long-term therapy with efavirenz, lopinavir/ritonavir and atazanavir].
Bernal E; Masiá M; Padilla S; Ramos JM; Martín-Hidalgo A; Gutiérrez F
Med Clin (Barc); 2007 Jul; 129(7):252-4. PubMed ID: 17683706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy and safety of replacing lopinavir with atazanavir in HIV-infected patients with undetectable plasma viraemia: final results of the SLOAT trial.
Soriano V; García-Gasco P; Vispo E; Ruiz-Sancho A; Blanco F; Martín-Carbonero L; Rodríguez-Novoa S; Morello J; de Mendoza C; Rivas P; Barreiro P; González-Lahoz J
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2008 Jan; 61(1):200-5. PubMed ID: 17999977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment response to ritonavir-boosted tipranavir versus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in HIV-1 patients with higher lopinavir mutation scores.
Walmsley SL; Cotte L; Rusconi S; Ward DJ; Hicks CB; Meier U; Valdez H; Boucher CA
AIDS; 2007 Oct; 21(16):2245-8. PubMed ID: 18090054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of six different ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based regimens in heavily antiretroviral-experienced HIV-infected patients.
de Mendoza C; Valer L; Ribera E; Barreiro P; Martín-Carbonero L; Ramirez G; Soriano V
HIV Clin Trials; 2006; 7(4):163-71. PubMed ID: 17065028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Decrease of atazanavir and lopinavir plasma concentrations in a boosted double human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor salvage regimen.
von Hentig N; Kaykhin P; Stephan C; Babacan E; Stürmer M; Staszewski S; Lötsch J
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2008 Jun; 52(6):2273-5. PubMed ID: 18411323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anti-HIV agents. The Castle study: lopinavir vs. atazanavir.
TreatmentUpdate; 2008 Mar; 20(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 18661646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost effectiveness of atazanavir-ritonavir versus lopinavir-ritonavir in treatment-naïve human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in the United States.
Broder MS; Chang EY; Bentley TG; Juday T; Uy J
J Med Econ; 2011; 14(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 21288058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir tablets compared with atazanavir plus ritonavir in antiretroviral-experienced patients in the UK, France, Italy and Spain.
Simpson KN; Jones WJ; Rajagopalan R; Dietz B
Clin Drug Investig; 2007; 27(12):807-17. PubMed ID: 18020538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A king in the CASTLE? Optimum initial HIV protease inhibitor.
Torti C; Frank I
Lancet; 2008 Aug; 372(9639):604-6. PubMed ID: 18722849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of baseline protease genotype and phenotype on HIV response to atazanavir/ritonavir in treatment-experienced patients.
Naeger LK; Struble KA
AIDS; 2006 Apr; 20(6):847-53. PubMed ID: 16549968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Successful treatment with atazanavir and lopinavir/ritonavir combination therapy in protease inhibitor-susceptible and protease inhibitor-resistant HIV-infected patients.
Gilliam BL; Chan-Tack KM; Qaqish RB; Rode RA; Fantry LE; Redfield RR
AIDS Patient Care STDS; 2006 Nov; 20(11):745-59. PubMed ID: 17134349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Drug interactions. Kaletra and atazanavir.
TreatmentUpdate; 2006; 18(3):7-8. PubMed ID: 17211919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative gender analysis of the efficacy and safety of atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir at 96 weeks in the CASTLE study.
Squires KE; Johnson M; Yang R; Uy J; Sheppard L; Absalon J; McGrath D
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2011 Feb; 66(2):363-70. PubMed ID: 21148235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Renal function in patients receiving tenofovir with ritonavir/lopinavir or ritonavir/atazanavir in the HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS) cohort.
Buchacz K; Young B; Baker RK; Moorman A; Chmiel JS; Wood KC; Brooks JT
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2006 Dec; 43(5):626-8. PubMed ID: 17133215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Atazanavir/ritonavir: a review of its use in HIV therapy.
von Hentig N
Drugs Today (Barc); 2008 Feb; 44(2):103-32. PubMed ID: 18389089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
