162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16261571)
1. Arterial input functions for dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: requirements and signal options.
Conturo TE; Akbudak E; Kotys MS; Chen ML; Chun SJ; Hsu RM; Sweeney CC; Markham J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 22(6):697-703. PubMed ID: 16261571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Precision, signal-to-noise ratio, and dose optimization of magnitude and phase arterial input functions in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Kotys MS; Akbudak E; Markham J; Conturo TE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):598-611. PubMed ID: 17326084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correcting saturation effects of the arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI: a Monte Carlo simulation.
Brunecker P; Villringer A; Schultze J; Nolte CH; Jungehülsing GJ; Endres M; Steinbrink J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 25(9):1300-11. PubMed ID: 17462846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bolus dispersion issues related to the quantification of perfusion MRI data.
Calamante F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 22(6):718-22. PubMed ID: 16261569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Partial volume effects on arterial input functions: shape and amplitude distortions and their correction.
van Osch MJ; van der Grond J; Bakker CJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 22(6):704-9. PubMed ID: 16261570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aspects on the accuracy of cerebral perfusion parameters obtained by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: a simulation study.
Knutsson L; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jul; 22(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 15234447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated perfusion-weighted MRI using localized arterial input functions.
Lorenz C; Benner T; Chen PJ; Lopez CJ; Ay H; Zhu MW; Menezes NM; Aronen H; Karonen J; Liu Y; Nuutinen J; Sorensen AG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(5):1133-9. PubMed ID: 16969793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Absolute quantification of cerebral blood flow in normal volunteers: correlation between Xe-133 SPECT and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Knutsson L; Börjesson S; Larsson EM; Risberg J; Gustafson L; Passant U; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):913-20. PubMed ID: 17896379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Calculation of cerebral perfusion parameters using regional arterial input functions identified by factor analysis.
Knutsson L; Larsson EM; Thilmann O; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Apr; 23(4):444-53. PubMed ID: 16523467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative assessment of regional cerebral blood flow by dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI, without the need for arterial blood signals.
Enmi J; Kudomi N; Hayashi T; Yamamoto A; Iguchi S; Moriguchi T; Hori Y; Koshino K; Zeniya T; Jon Shah N; Yamada N; Iida H
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Dec; 57(23):7873-92. PubMed ID: 23151851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Arterial input function in perfusion MRI: a comprehensive review.
Calamante F
Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc; 2013 Oct; 74():1-32. PubMed ID: 24083460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of partial-volume effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance perfusion imaging.
Chen JJ; Smith MR; Frayne R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Sep; 22(3):390-9. PubMed ID: 16104009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimal location for arterial input function measurements near the middle cerebral artery in first-pass perfusion MRI.
Bleeker EJ; van Buchem MA; van Osch MJ
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2009 Apr; 29(4):840-52. PubMed ID: 19142193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of using local arterial input functions on cerebral blood flow estimation.
Lorenz C; Benner T; Lopez CJ; Ay H; Zhu MW; Aronen H; Karonen J; Liu Y; Nuutinen J; Sorensen AG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 16767708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correcting the effects of background microcirculation in the measurement of arterial input functions using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI of the brain.
Thornton RJ; Jones JY; Wang ZJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jun; 24(5):619-23. PubMed ID: 16735184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimising the effects of bolus dispersion in bolus-tracking MRI.
Willats L; Connelly A; Calamante F
NMR Biomed; 2008 Nov; 21(10):1126-37. PubMed ID: 18727165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is correction necessary when clinically determining quantitative cerebral perfusion parameters from multi-slice dynamic susceptibility contrast MR studies?
Salluzzi M; Frayne R; Smith MR
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):407-24. PubMed ID: 16394347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved reliability of perfusion estimation in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI by using the arterial input function from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
Tseng CH; Jaspers J; Romero AM; Wielopolski P; Smits M; van Osch MJP; Vos F
NMR Biomed; 2024 Jan; 37(1):e5038. PubMed ID: 37712359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transverse relaxation effect of MRI contrast agents: a crucial issue for quantitative measurements of cerebral perfusion.
Kiselev VG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 22(6):693-6. PubMed ID: 16261568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
