249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16261714)
1. [Participation in the Dutch national screening programme for uterine cervic cancer higher after invitation by a general practitioner, especially in groups with a traditional low level of attendance].
de Nooijer DP; de Waart FG; van Leeuwen AW; Spijker WW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Oct; 149(42):2339-43. PubMed ID: 16261714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening for cervical carcinoma.
van Leeuwen AW; de Nooijer P; Hop WC
Cancer; 2005 Oct; 105(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 15937918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preliminary results of a general practice based call system for cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands.
Palm BT; Kant AC; van den Bosch WJ; Vooijs GP; van Weel C
Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Dec; 43(377):503-6. PubMed ID: 8312021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The 1996 revision of the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: increased coverage, fewer repeat smears and less opportunistic screening].
Berkers LM; van Ballegooijen M; van Kemenade FJ; Rebolj M; Essink-Bot ML; Helmerhorst TJ; Habbema JD
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Jun; 151(23):1288-94. PubMed ID: 17624160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A primary healthcare-based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
Jensen H; Svanholm H; Støvring H; Bro F
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2009 Jul; 63(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 19228681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Incidence of cervical cancer in women in North-Holland by country of birth from 1988-1998].
Visser O; Busquet EH; van Leeuwen FE; Aaronson NK; Ory FG
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Jan; 147(2):70-4. PubMed ID: 12602072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attendance to cervical cancer screening in family practices in The Netherlands.
Hermens RP; Tacken MA; Hulscher ME; Braspenning JC; Grol RP
Prev Med; 2000 Jan; 30(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10642458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A population-based study of primary care predictors of non-attendance for cervical screening.
Webb R; Richardson J; Pickles A
J Med Screen; 2004; 11(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 15333272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in screening history, tumour characteristics and survival between women with screen-detected versus not screen-detected cervical cancer in the east of The Netherlands, 1992-2001.
van der Aa MA; Schutter EM; Looijen-Salamon M; Martens JE; Siesling S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18093720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A large population-based randomized controlled trial to increase attendance at screening for cervical cancer.
Eaker S; Adami HO; Granath F; Wilander E; Sparén P
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Mar; 13(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 15006907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization.
Tacken MA; Braspenning JC; Hermens RP; Spreeuwenberg PM; van den Hoogen HJ; de Bakker DH; Groenewegen PP; Grol RP
Eur J Public Health; 2007 Apr; 17(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 16837520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast cancer screening participation among Turks and Moroccans in the Netherlands: exploring reasons for nonattendance.
Hartman E; van den Muijsenbergh ME; Haneveld RW
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2009 Sep; 18(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 19581808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-grade cervical abnormalities and screening intervals in New South Wales, Australia.
Schindeler S; Morrell S; Zuo Y; Baker D
J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18416954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical cancer screening in the Ferrara Local Health Authority catchment area.
Bergamini M; Buriani O; Cucchi A; De Togni A; Carpanelli MC; Cervato K; Gigli F; Pizzo F; Ravasini G; Rauli G; Rizzello R; Gregorio P
J Prev Med Hyg; 2007 Dec; 48(4):141-8. PubMed ID: 18557309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. General practitioner based screening for cervical cancer: higher participation of women with a higher risk?
Kant AC; Palm BT; Wentink E; van Weel C
J Med Screen; 1997; 4(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 9200061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Women's perceptions and social barriers determine compliance to cervical screening: results from a population based study in India.
Basu P; Sarkar S; Mukherjee S; Ghoshal M; Mittal S; Biswas S; Mandal R; Sankaranarayanan R
Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 16963194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How do women who choose not to participate in population-based cervical cancer screening reason about their decision?
Blomberg K; Ternestedt BM; Törnberg S; Tishelman C
Psychooncology; 2008 Jun; 17(6):561-9. PubMed ID: 17886262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening for cervical cancer by general practitioners in Ghent, Belgium.
De Schryver A; Derese A; Geldhof A; Vuylsteek K
Cancer Detect Prev; 1989; 13(5-6):343-8. PubMed ID: 2743357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical cancer screening programme in Primorsko-Goranska County, Croatia--the results of the pilot study.
Vrdoljak-Mozetic D; Ostojić DV; Stemberger-Papić S; Janković S; Glibotić-Kresina H; Brncić-Fischer A; Benić-Salamon K
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 20437641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
