These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16261926)
1. Infrared thermography and ultrasonography to indirectly monitor the influence of liner type and overmilking on teat tissue recovery. Paulrud CO; Clausen S; Andersen PE; Rasmussen MD Acta Vet Scand; 2005; 46(3):137-47. PubMed ID: 16261926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short communication: Teat wall diameter and teat tissue thickness in dairy cows are affected by intramammary pressure and by the mechanical forces of machine milking. Odorcic M; Blau U; Löfstrand J; Bruckmaier RM J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jan; 103(1):884-889. PubMed ID: 31733859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of milking technique and lactation on the bovine teat by means of ultrasonographic examination. Khol JL; Franz S; Klein D; Lexer D; Waiblinger S; Luger K; Baumgartner W Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2006; 119(1-2):68-73. PubMed ID: 16450712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An observational study investigating the association of ultrasonographically assessed machine milking-induced changes in teat condition and teat-end shape in dairy cows. Wieland M; Virkler PD; Borkowski AH; Älveby N; Wood P; Nydam DV Animal; 2019 Feb; 13(2):341-348. PubMed ID: 29925442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recovery of cow teats after milking as determined by ultrasonographic scanning. Neijenhuis F; Klungel GH; Hogeveen H J Dairy Sci; 2001 Dec; 84(12):2599-606. PubMed ID: 11814016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine milking-induced changes in teat canal dimensions as assessed by ultrasonography. Melvin JM; Heuwieser W; Virkler PD; Nydam DV; Wieland M J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2657-2669. PubMed ID: 30639026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of teatcup liner tension on teat canal keratin and teat condition in cows. Capuco AV; Wood DL; Quast JW J Dairy Res; 2000 Aug; 67(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 11037229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of overmilking and liner type and characteristics on teat tissue in small ruminants. Alejandro M; Roca A; Romero G; Díaz JR J Dairy Res; 2014 May; 81(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 24594275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Blood perfusion of teat tissue in dairy cows: Changes associated with pre-milking stimulation and machine milking. Wieland M; Shirky S; Gioia G; Sipka A; Virkler PD; Nydam DV; Älveby N; Porter IR J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6588-6599. PubMed ID: 32389482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How does the milk removal method affect teat tissue and teat recovery in dairy ewes? Alejandro M; Roca A; Romero G; Díaz JR J Dairy Res; 2014 Aug; 81(3):350-7. PubMed ID: 24914749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increased teat wall thickness in response to machine milking. Stauffer C; Van der Vekens E; Stoffel MH; Schweizer D; Bruckmaier RM J Dairy Sci; 2021 Aug; 104(8):9082-9092. PubMed ID: 34024610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reverse pressure gradients across the teat canal related to machine milking. Rasmussen MD; Frimer ES; Decker EL J Dairy Sci; 1994 Apr; 77(4):984-93. PubMed ID: 8201056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Teat tissue reactions to milking: effects of vacuum level. Hamann J; Mein GA; Wetzel S J Dairy Sci; 1993 Apr; 76(4):1040-6. PubMed ID: 8486836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of a multi-sided concave liner barrel design on thickness and roughness of teat-end hyperkeratosis. Haeussermann A; Britten J; Britten A; Pahl C; Älveby N; Hartung E J Dairy Res; 2016 May; 83(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 27210492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of pulsationless milking on teat canal keratin and mastitis. Capuco AV; Mein GA; Nickerson SC; Jack LJ; Wood DL; Bright SA; Aschenbrenner RA; Miller RH; Bitman J J Dairy Sci; 1994 Jan; 77(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 7509817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bimodal milk flow and overmilking in dairy cattle: risk factors and consequences. Fernandes S; Pereira G; Bexiga R Animal; 2023 Mar; 17(3):100716. PubMed ID: 36791490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variation in distances among teats of Holstein cows: implications for automated milking. Miller RH; Fulton LA; Erez B; Williams WF; Pearson RE J Dairy Sci; 1995 Jul; 78(7):1456-62. PubMed ID: 7593838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of inner teat morphology by using high-resolution ultrasound: Changes due to milking and establishment of measurement traits of the distal teat canal. Martin LM; Stöcker C; Sauerwein H; Büscher W; Müller U J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8417-8428. PubMed ID: 29935835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in cow teat tissue created by two types of milking cluster. Hillerton JE; Ohnstad I; Baines JR; Leach KA J Dairy Res; 2000 Aug; 67(3):309-17. PubMed ID: 11037228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of a latency period between pre-stimulation and teat cup attachment and periodic vacuum reduction on milking characteristics and teat condition in dairy cows. Vetter A; van Dorland HA; Youssef M; Bruckmaier RM J Dairy Res; 2014 Feb; 81(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 24433587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]