These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16261934)

  • 1. Intra- and interlaboratory performance of antibiotic disk-diffusion-susceptibility testing of bacterial control strains of relevance for monitoring aquaculture environments.
    Huys G; Cnockaert M; Bartie K; Oanh DT; Phuong NT; Somsiri T; Chinabut S; Yussoff FM; Shariff M; Giacomini M; Bertone S; Swings J; Teale A
    Dis Aquat Organ; 2005 Sep; 66(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 16261934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Results from a German interlaboratory test to establish the broth microdilution method for the determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration of bacteria from animals].
    Wallmann J; Böttner A; Hafez HM; Kehrenberg C; Kietzmann M; Klarmann D; Klein G; Krabisch P; Kühn T; Luhofer G; Richter A; Schwarz S; Sigge C; Traeder W; Waldmann KH; Werckenthin C; Zschiesche E
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2005; 118(5-6):205-13. PubMed ID: 15918484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical methods for establishing quality control ranges for antibacterial agents in Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute susceptibility testing.
    Turnidge J; Bordash G
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2007 Jul; 51(7):2483-8. PubMed ID: 17438045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disk diffusion test and E-test with enriched Mueller-Hinton agar for determining susceptibility of Candida species to voriconazole and fluconazole.
    Lee SC; Lo HJ; Fung CP; Lee N; See LC
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2009 Apr; 42(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 19597647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Setting interpretive breakpoints for antimicrobial susceptibility testing using disk diffusion.
    Kronvall G; Giske CG; Kahlmeter G
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2011 Oct; 38(4):281-90. PubMed ID: 21640560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of the EUCAST disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing method and its implementation in routine microbiology laboratories.
    Matuschek E; Brown DF; Kahlmeter G
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Apr; 20(4):O255-66. PubMed ID: 24131428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori to metronidazole.
    Perna F; Gatta L; Figura N; Ricci C; Tampieri A; Holton J; Miglioli M; Vaira D
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Oct; 98(10):2157-61. PubMed ID: 14572561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How does susceptibility prevalence impact on the performance of disk diffusion susceptibility testing?
    Lamy B; Carret G; Flandrois JP; Delignette-Muller ML
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2004 Jun; 49(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 15183863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from aquaculture sources in Australia.
    Akinbowale OL; Peng H; Barton MD
    J Appl Microbiol; 2006 May; 100(5):1103-13. PubMed ID: 16630011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating the precision of disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility data published by the European committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
    Smith P; Kronvall G
    APMIS; 2014 Nov; 122(11):1096-101. PubMed ID: 24730430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Results of an interlaboratory test on antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria from animals by broth microdilution.
    Wallmann J; Böttner A; Goossens L; Hafez HM; Hartmann K; Kaspar H; Kehrenberg C; Kietzmann M; Klarmann D; Klein G; Krabisch P; Kühn T; Luhofer G; Richter A; Schulz B; Schwarz S; Sigge C; Traeder W; Waldmann KH; Werckenthin C; ; Zschiesche E
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2006 Jun; 27(6):482-90. PubMed ID: 16697559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts.
    Augustin JC; Carlier V
    Food Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 23(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 16942983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical microbiology laboratories do not always detect resistance of Haemophilus influenzae with disk or tablet diffusion methods. Finnish Study Group for Antimicrobial Resistance (FiRe).
    Manninen R; Huovinen P; Nissinen A
    APMIS; 1998 Apr; 106(4):434-40. PubMed ID: 9637264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multicentre determination of quality control strains and quality control ranges for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts and filamentous fungi using the methods of the Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AFST-EUCAST).
    Cuenca-Estrella M; Arendrup MC; Chryssanthou E; Dannaoui E; Lass-Florl C; Sandven P; Velegraki A; Rodriguez-Tudela JL;
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2007 Oct; 13(10):1018-22. PubMed ID: 17697001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Epidemiologic cutoff values for antimicrobial agents against Aeromonas salmonicida isolates determined by frequency distributions of minimal inhibitory concentration and diameter of zone of inhibition data.
    Miller RA; Reimschuessel R
    Am J Vet Res; 2006 Nov; 67(11):1837-43. PubMed ID: 17078743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in Sweden. III. Methodology for susceptibility testing.
    Olsson-Liljequist B; Larsson P; Walder M; Miörner H
    Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 1997; 105():13-23. PubMed ID: 9435027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Results of two methods for testing bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics: disk method and a new semi-automatic method in liquid medium (ABACR procedure) and comparison with the minimal inhibitory concentration (author's transl)].
    Véron M; Ghnassia JC; Berche P; Daoulas-Le Bourdellès F; Avril JL; Fauchère JL; de Meirleire F; Descamps P
    Ann Microbiol (Paris); 1978; 129(4):473-502. PubMed ID: 100035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparisons of the in vitro susceptibility testing results for garenoxacin using six different national methods: report from the garenoxacin international bridging study.
    Jones RN; Gordon KA; Biedenbach DJ
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2004 Feb; 53(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 14729758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Harmonization of antimicrobial susceptibility testing breakpoints in Europe: implications for reporting intermediate susceptibility.
    Brown D; Macgowan A
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2010 Feb; 65(2):183-5. PubMed ID: 19996143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparative evaluation of e-test and disk diffusion methods for susceptibility testing of Nocardia species].
    Perçin D; Sümerkan B; Inci R
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Apr; 45(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 21644070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.