These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16262464)

  • 1. Socially desirable responding and the factorial stability of the NEO PI-R.
    Marshall MB; De Fruyt F; Rolland JP; Bagby RM
    Psychol Assess; 2005 Sep; 17(3):379-84. PubMed ID: 16262464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Five-factor Personality Inventory as a measure of the Five-factor Model: Belgian, American, and Hungarian comparisons with the NEO-PI-R.
    De Fruyt F; McCrae RR; Szirmák Z; Nagy J
    Assessment; 2004 Sep; 11(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 15358876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Positive impression management and its influence on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: a comparison of analog and differential prevalence group designs.
    Bagby RM; Marshall MB
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 14593833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A five-factor model perspective on psychopathy and comorbid Axis-II disorders in a forensic-psychiatric sample.
    Decuyper M; De Fruyt F; Buschman J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):394-406. PubMed ID: 18790537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of response sets on NEO-PI-R scores and their relations to external criteria.
    Caldwell-Andrews A; Baer RA; Berry DT
    J Pers Assess; 2000 Jun; 74(3):472-88. PubMed ID: 10900573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of positive impression management on the NEO Personality Inventory--Revised in a clinical population.
    Ballenger JF; Caldwell-Andrews A; Baer RA
    Psychol Assess; 2001 Jun; 13(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 11433800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing two alternative measures of general personality in the assessment of psychopathy: a test of the NEO PI-R and the MPQ.
    Gaughan ET; Miller JD; Pryor LR; Lynam DR
    J Pers; 2009 Aug; 77(4):965-96. PubMed ID: 19558446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factor structure of the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Basic Questionnaire and its relationship with the revised NEO personality inventory in a Japanese sample.
    Maruta T; Yamate T; Iimori M; Kato M; Livesley WJ
    Compr Psychiatry; 2006; 47(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 17067879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-term stability of NEO-PI-R personality trait scores in opioid-dependent outpatients.
    Carter JA; Herbst JH; Stoller KB; King VL; Kidorf MS; Costa PT; Brooner RK
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2001 Sep; 15(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 11563805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The utility of the NEO-PI-R validity scales to detect response distortion: a comparison with the MMPI-2.
    Morasco BJ; Gfeller JD; Elder KA
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Jun; 88(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 17518549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A study of affective temperaments in Hungary: internal consistency and concurrent validity of the TEMPS-A against the TCI and NEO-PI-R.
    Rózsa S; Rihmer Z; Gonda X; Szili I; Rihmer A; Ko N; Németh A; Pestality P; Bagdy G; Alhassoon O; Akiskal KK; Akiskal HS
    J Affect Disord; 2008 Feb; 106(1-2):45-53. PubMed ID: 17706791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Thinking styles in relation to personality traits: an investigation of the Thinking Styles Inventory and NEO-PI-R.
    Fjell AM; Walhovd KB
    Scand J Psychol; 2004 Sep; 45(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 15281918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Substance or style? An investigation of the NEO-PI-R validity scales.
    Morey LC; Quigley BD; Sanislow CA; Skodol AE; McGlashan TH; Shea MT; Stout RL; Zanarini MC; Gunderson JG
    J Pers Assess; 2002 Dec; 79(3):583-99. PubMed ID: 12511022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Replicable item-cluster subcomponents in the NEO Five-Factor Inventory.
    Saucier G
    J Pers Assess; 1998 Apr; 70(2):263-76. PubMed ID: 9697330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age trends and age norms for the NEO Personality Inventory-3 in adolescents and adults.
    McCrae RR; Martin TA; Costa PT
    Assessment; 2005 Dec; 12(4):363-73. PubMed ID: 16244117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The validity and utility of the positive presentation management and negative presentation management scales for the Revised NEO Personality Inventory.
    Sellbom M; Bagby RM
    Assessment; 2008 Jun; 15(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 18463407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Socially desirable responding on the web: investigating the candor hypothesis.
    Risko EF; Quilty LC; Oakman JM
    J Pers Assess; 2006 Dec; 87(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 17134335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model.
    Maples JL; Guan L; Carter NT; Miller JD
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Dec; 26(4):1070-84. PubMed ID: 24932643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The MCMI-III personality disorders scores predicted by the NEO-FFI-R and the ZKPQ-50-CC: a comparative study.
    Aluja A; García LF; Cuevas L; García O
    J Pers Disord; 2007 Feb; 21(1):58-71. PubMed ID: 17373890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dimensionality of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and its relationships with the Three-and the Five-factor personality models.
    Aluja A; Rolland JP; García LF; Rossier J
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Apr; 88(2):246-9. PubMed ID: 17437388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.