These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16262469)

  • 1. An anatomically constrained, stochastic model of eye movement control in reading.
    McDonald SA; Carpenter RH; Shillcock RC
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Oct; 112(4):814-40. PubMed ID: 16262469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eye-movement models for arithmetic and reading performance.
    Suppes P
    Rev Oculomot Res; 1990; 4():455-77. PubMed ID: 7492535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is not cumulative across multiple saccades.
    McDonald SA
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1829-34. PubMed ID: 15797772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity.
    White SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):205-23. PubMed ID: 18248149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is only obtained from the saccade goal.
    McDonald SA
    Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(26):4416-24. PubMed ID: 17045323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The implications of foveal splitting for saccade planning in reading.
    McDonald SA; Shillcock RC
    Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(6):801-20. PubMed ID: 15639506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? Evidence from eye movements.
    Yang J; Wang S; Xu Y; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1192-204. PubMed ID: 19653758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semantic preview benefit in eye movements during reading: A parafoveal fast-priming study.
    Hohenstein S; Laubrock J; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1150-70. PubMed ID: 20804291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A biologically realistic cortical model of eye movement control in reading.
    Heinzle J; Hepp K; Martin KA
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Jul; 117(3):808-30. PubMed ID: 20658854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: does an extra space make a difference?
    Drieghe D; Brysbaert M; Desmet T
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(13):1693-706. PubMed ID: 15792844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinct subsystems for the parafoveal processing of spatial and linguistic information during eye fixations in reading.
    Inhoff AW; Radach R; Eiter BM; Juhasz B
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jul; 56(5):803-27. PubMed ID: 12850988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oculomotor control in a sequential search task.
    Trukenbrod HA; Engbert R
    Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(18):2426-43. PubMed ID: 17662332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading.
    Kennedy A; Pynte J
    Vision Res; 2005 Jan; 45(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 15581917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CRISP: a computational model of fixation durations in scene viewing.
    Nuthmann A; Smith TJ; Engbert R; Henderson JM
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Apr; 117(2):382-405. PubMed ID: 20438231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
    Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eye movement control during reading: foveal load and parafoveal processing.
    Schroyens W; Vitu F; Brysbaert M; d'Ydewalle G
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 Nov; 52(4):1021-46. PubMed ID: 10605397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SWIFT explorations of age differences in eye movements during reading.
    Laubrock J; Kliegl R; Engbert R
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2006; 30(6):872-84. PubMed ID: 16904181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mindless reading revisited: an analysis based on the SWIFT model of eye-movement control.
    Nuthmann A; Engbert R
    Vision Res; 2009 Feb; 49(3):322-36. PubMed ID: 19026673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.