These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16262491)

  • 1. Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited.
    Drieghe D; Rayner K; Pollatsek A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):954-9. PubMed ID: 16262491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading.
    Yan M; Kliegl R; Shu H; Pan J; Zhou X
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1669-76. PubMed ID: 20731511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
    Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading.
    Kennedy A; Pynte J
    Vision Res; 2005 Jan; 45(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 15581917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is attention confined to one word at a time? The spatial distribution of parafoveal preview benefits during reading.
    Wang CA; Inhoff AW; Radach R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1487-94. PubMed ID: 19801609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers.
    Rayner K; Reichle ED; Stroud MJ; Williams CC; Pollatsek A
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):448-65. PubMed ID: 16953709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: does an extra space make a difference?
    Drieghe D; Brysbaert M; Desmet T
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(13):1693-706. PubMed ID: 15792844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semantic preview benefit in eye movements during reading: A parafoveal fast-priming study.
    Hohenstein S; Laubrock J; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1150-70. PubMed ID: 20804291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity.
    White SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):205-23. PubMed ID: 18248149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: evidence against parafoveal lexical activation.
    Johnson RL; Dunne MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):191-212. PubMed ID: 22060141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? Evidence from eye movements.
    Yang J; Wang S; Xu Y; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1192-204. PubMed ID: 19653758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reading skill and word skipping: Implications for visual and linguistic accounts of word skipping.
    Eskenazi MA; Folk JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1923-8. PubMed ID: 26098181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of parafoveal word length and contextual constraint on fixation durations and word skipping in reading.
    White SJ; Rayner K; Liversedge SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Jun; 12(3):466-71. PubMed ID: 16235630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model.
    Rayner K; Ashby J; Pollatsek A; Reichle ED
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Aug; 30(4):720-32. PubMed ID: 15301620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence for delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+2 in reading.
    Risse S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):1026-42. PubMed ID: 22428669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exterior letters are not privileged in the early stage of visual word recognition during reading: comment on Jordan, Thomas, Patching and Scott-Brown (2003).
    Inhoff AW; Radach R; Eiter BM; Skelly M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):894-9. PubMed ID: 14516222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contextual constraint and N + 2 preview effects in reading.
    Radach R; Inhoff AW; Glover L; Vorstius C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):619-33. PubMed ID: 23394582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.