202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16262493)
1. Time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading.
Inhoff AW; Eiter BM; Radach R
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):979-95. PubMed ID: 16262493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contextual constraint and N + 2 preview effects in reading.
Radach R; Inhoff AW; Glover L; Vorstius C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):619-33. PubMed ID: 23394582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is attention confined to one word at a time? The spatial distribution of parafoveal preview benefits during reading.
Wang CA; Inhoff AW; Radach R
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1487-94. PubMed ID: 19801609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals.
Altarriba J; Kambe G; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):875-90. PubMed ID: 11521853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading.
Inhoff AW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):544-55. PubMed ID: 2527961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distinct subsystems for the parafoveal processing of spatial and linguistic information during eye fixations in reading.
Inhoff AW; Radach R; Eiter BM; Juhasz B
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jul; 56(5):803-27. PubMed ID: 12850988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early parafoveal processing in reading Chinese sentences.
Yen MH; Radach R; Tzeng OJ; Hung DL; Tsai JL
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 May; 131(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 19285294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: a study with fixation-related brain potentials.
Dimigen O; Kliegl R; Sommer W
Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):381-93. PubMed ID: 22521255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extraction of linguistic information from successive words during reading: evidence for spatially distributed lexical processing.
Wang CA; Inhoff AW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):662-77. PubMed ID: 23088508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading.
Yan M; Kliegl R; Shu H; Pan J; Zhou X
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1669-76. PubMed ID: 20731511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The frequency-predictability interaction in reading: it depends where you're coming from.
Hand CJ; Miellet S; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1294-313. PubMed ID: 20854004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lexical integration across saccades in reading.
Inhoff AW; Tousman S
Psychol Res; 1990; 52(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 2287696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Integrating information across eye fixations in reading: the role of letter and word units.
Inhoff AW
Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Apr; 73(3):281-97. PubMed ID: 2353591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How preview space/time translates into preview cost/benefit for fixation durations during reading.
Kliegl R; Hohenstein S; Yan M; McDonald SA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):581-600. PubMed ID: 22515948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading.
Risse S; Kliegl R
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):653-68. PubMed ID: 24294870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Semantic preview benefit during reading.
Hohenstein S; Kliegl R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):166-90. PubMed ID: 23895448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial?
Inhoff AW; Starr M; Shindler KL
Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1474-84. PubMed ID: 11143457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Word processing in the parafoveal region.
Lee CH; Kim K
Int J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 44(5):369-77. PubMed ID: 22029615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
Plummer P; Rayner K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
