BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16262496)

  • 1. Naive optics: acting on mirror reflections.
    Hecht H; Bertamini M; Gamer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1023-38. PubMed ID: 16262496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Naïve predictions of motion and orientation in mirrors: From what we see to what we expect reflections to do.
    Savardi U; Bianchi I; Bertamini M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 20015479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Naive optics: Predicting and perceiving reflections in mirrors.
    Bertamini M; Spooner A; Hecht H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):982-1002. PubMed ID: 14585018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Overestimation of the projected size of objects on the surface of mirrors and windows.
    Lawson R; Bertamini M; Liu D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1027-44. PubMed ID: 17924805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regularity of symmetry verticality guides perceptual judgments of objects.
    Schiano DJ; McBeath MK; Chambers KW
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(2):209-27. PubMed ID: 18510133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between frames of reference and mirror-image reversals.
    Yoshimura H; Tabata T
    Perception; 2007; 36(7):1049-56. PubMed ID: 17844970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Naive optics: understanding the geometry of mirror reflections.
    Croucher CJ; Bertamini M; Hecht H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):546-62. PubMed ID: 12075887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Errors in judging information about reflections in mirrors.
    Lawson R; Bertamini M
    Perception; 2006; 35(9):1265-88. PubMed ID: 17120845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How perception impacts on drawings.
    Mitchell P; Ropar D; Ackroyd K; Rajendran G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):996-1003. PubMed ID: 16262494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast and assimilation in categorization and exemplar production.
    Zotov V; Jones MN; Mewhort DJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):621-39. PubMed ID: 21264728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Looking at perspective pictures from too far, too close, and just right.
    Juricevic I; Kennedy JM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Aug; 135(3):448-61. PubMed ID: 16846274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Judgments of synchrony between auditory and moving or still visual stimuli.
    Fouriezos G; Capstick G; Monette F; Bellemare C; Parkinson M; Dumoulin A
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):277-92. PubMed ID: 18266504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A theory of dynamic occluded and illusory object perception.
    Palmer EM; Kellman PJ; Shipley TF
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):513-41. PubMed ID: 17087570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A principal components analysis of dynamic spatial memory biases.
    Motes MA; Hubbard TL; Courtney JR; Rypma B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1076-83. PubMed ID: 18763892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Galileo bias: a naive conceptual belief that influences people's perceptions and performance in a ball-dropping task.
    Oberle CD; McBeath MK; Madigan SC; Sugar TG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):643-53. PubMed ID: 16060770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of self-motion on attention in real 3D space.
    Kimura T; Miura T; Doi S; Yamamoto Y
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jul; 131(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 19524213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of forces exerted by objects in collision events.
    White PA
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jul; 116(3):580-601. PubMed ID: 19618988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective time in near and far representational space.
    Zäch P; Brugger P
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2008 Mar; 21(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 18327017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biases in judgments of separation and orientation of elements belonging to different clusters.
    Seizova-Cajic T; Gillam B
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2525-34. PubMed ID: 16563460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial grouping determines temporal integration.
    Hermens F; Scharnowski F; Herzog MH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):595-610. PubMed ID: 19485680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.