These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16262496)

  • 1. Naive optics: acting on mirror reflections.
    Hecht H; Bertamini M; Gamer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1023-38. PubMed ID: 16262496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Naïve predictions of motion and orientation in mirrors: From what we see to what we expect reflections to do.
    Savardi U; Bianchi I; Bertamini M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 20015479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Naive optics: Predicting and perceiving reflections in mirrors.
    Bertamini M; Spooner A; Hecht H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):982-1002. PubMed ID: 14585018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Overestimation of the projected size of objects on the surface of mirrors and windows.
    Lawson R; Bertamini M; Liu D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1027-44. PubMed ID: 17924805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regularity of symmetry verticality guides perceptual judgments of objects.
    Schiano DJ; McBeath MK; Chambers KW
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(2):209-27. PubMed ID: 18510133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between frames of reference and mirror-image reversals.
    Yoshimura H; Tabata T
    Perception; 2007; 36(7):1049-56. PubMed ID: 17844970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Naive optics: understanding the geometry of mirror reflections.
    Croucher CJ; Bertamini M; Hecht H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):546-62. PubMed ID: 12075887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Errors in judging information about reflections in mirrors.
    Lawson R; Bertamini M
    Perception; 2006; 35(9):1265-88. PubMed ID: 17120845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How perception impacts on drawings.
    Mitchell P; Ropar D; Ackroyd K; Rajendran G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):996-1003. PubMed ID: 16262494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast and assimilation in categorization and exemplar production.
    Zotov V; Jones MN; Mewhort DJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):621-39. PubMed ID: 21264728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Looking at perspective pictures from too far, too close, and just right.
    Juricevic I; Kennedy JM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Aug; 135(3):448-61. PubMed ID: 16846274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Judgments of synchrony between auditory and moving or still visual stimuli.
    Fouriezos G; Capstick G; Monette F; Bellemare C; Parkinson M; Dumoulin A
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):277-92. PubMed ID: 18266504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A theory of dynamic occluded and illusory object perception.
    Palmer EM; Kellman PJ; Shipley TF
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):513-41. PubMed ID: 17087570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A principal components analysis of dynamic spatial memory biases.
    Motes MA; Hubbard TL; Courtney JR; Rypma B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1076-83. PubMed ID: 18763892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Galileo bias: a naive conceptual belief that influences people's perceptions and performance in a ball-dropping task.
    Oberle CD; McBeath MK; Madigan SC; Sugar TG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):643-53. PubMed ID: 16060770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of self-motion on attention in real 3D space.
    Kimura T; Miura T; Doi S; Yamamoto Y
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jul; 131(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 19524213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of forces exerted by objects in collision events.
    White PA
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jul; 116(3):580-601. PubMed ID: 19618988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective time in near and far representational space.
    Zäch P; Brugger P
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2008 Mar; 21(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 18327017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biases in judgments of separation and orientation of elements belonging to different clusters.
    Seizova-Cajic T; Gillam B
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2525-34. PubMed ID: 16563460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial grouping determines temporal integration.
    Hermens F; Scharnowski F; Herzog MH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):595-610. PubMed ID: 19485680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.