These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: effects of phonotactic probability and onset density. Vitevitch MS; Armbruster J; Chu S J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):514-29. PubMed ID: 14979821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acoustic analysis of speech timing in Huntington's disease. Hertrich I; Ackermann H Brain Lang; 1994 Aug; 47(2):182-96. PubMed ID: 7953613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels. Ferguson SH; Kewley-Port D J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1241-55. PubMed ID: 17905909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of speaking rate on consonant vowel coarticulation. Agwuele A; Sussman HM; Lindblom B Phonetica; 2008; 65(4):194-209. PubMed ID: 19221451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does word length affect speech onset latencies when producing single words? Damian MF; Bowers JS; Stadthagen-Gonzalez H; Spalek K J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):892-905. PubMed ID: 20565208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How to stretch and shrink vowel systems: results from a vowel normalization procedure. Geng C; Mooshammer C J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3278-88. PubMed ID: 19425670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consonant and vowel production of right hemisphere patients. Kurowski KM; Blumstein SE; Mathison H Brain Lang; 1998 Jun; 63(2):276-300. PubMed ID: 9654435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users. Donaldson GS; Kreft HA Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech production of normally aging adults. Benjamin BJ Semin Speech Lang; 1997 May; 18(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 9195686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acoustic characteristics of clearly spoken English fricatives. Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3962-73. PubMed ID: 19507978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the complexities of measuring naming. Rastle K; Davis MH J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Apr; 28(2):307-14. PubMed ID: 11999856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. F2 locus equations: phonetic descriptors of coarticulation in 17- to 22-month-old children. Gibson T; Ohde RN J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Feb; 50(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 17344551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acoustic variability within and across German, French, and American English vowels: phonetic context effects. Strange W; Weber A; Levy ES; Shafiro V; Hisagi M; Nishi K J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1111-29. PubMed ID: 17672658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of speaking rate and vowel length on formant frequency displacement in Japanese. Hirata Y; Tsukada K Phonetica; 2009; 66(3):129-49. PubMed ID: 19776664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incorporation of phonetic constraints in acoustic-to-articulatory inversion. Potard B; Laprie Y; Ouni S J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2310-23. PubMed ID: 18397035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of whole-body vibration on acoustic measures of speech. Bond ZS; Moore TJ Aviat Space Environ Med; 1990 Nov; 61(11):989-93. PubMed ID: 2256887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]