154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16263008)
1. Pitfalls in the construction of cancer guidelines demonstrated by the analyses of colorectal referrals.
Hodder RJ; Ballal M; Selvachandran SN; Cade D
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Nov; 87(6):419-26. PubMed ID: 16263008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of a patient consultation questionnaire and weighted numerical scoring system for the prediction of colorectal cancer and other colorectal pathology in symptomatic patients: a prospective cohort validation study of a Welsh population.
Ballal MS; Selvachandran SN; Maw A
Colorectal Dis; 2010 May; 12(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 19570067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of a patient consultation questionnaire-based scoring system for stratification of outpatient risk of colorectal cancer.
Rai S; Ballal M; Thomas WM; Miller AS; Jameson JS; Steward WP
Br J Surg; 2008 Mar; 95(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 17932877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Referral guidelines for colorectal cancer--do they work?
Eccersley AJ; Wilson EM; Makris A; Novell JR
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2003 Mar; 85(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 12648341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variations in the evaluation of colorectal cancer risk.
Hodder RJ; Ballal M; Selvachandran SN; Cade D
Colorectal Dis; 2005 May; 7(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 15859964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective study to assess the value of MMP-9 in improving the appropriateness of urgent referrals for colorectal cancer.
Ryan AV; Wilson S; Wakelam MJ; Warmington SA; Dunn JA; Hobbs RF; Martin A; Ismail T
BMC Cancer; 2006 Oct; 6():251. PubMed ID: 17059590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prioritization of colorectal referrals: a review of the 2-week wait referral system.
Rai S; Kelly MJ
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Mar; 9(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 17298615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How relevant are ACOG and SGO guidelines for referral of adnexal mass?
Dearking AC; Aletti GD; McGree ME; Weaver AL; Sommerfield MK; Cliby WA
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):841-8. PubMed ID: 17906018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter general practice variability in use of referral guidelines for colorectal cancer.
John SK; Jones OM; Horseman N; Thomas P; Howell RD; Fozard JB
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Oct; 9(8):731-5. PubMed ID: 17854292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is anaemia relevant in the referral and diagnosis of colorectal cancer?
Masson S; Chinn DJ; Tabaqchali MA; Waddup G; Dwarakanath AD
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Oct; 9(8):736-9. PubMed ID: 17854293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gastroenterologists utilize the referral for EGD to enhance colon cancer screening more effectively than primary care physicians.
Menees SB; Scheiman J; Carlos R; Mulder A; Fendrick AM
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Apr; 23(7):953-62. PubMed ID: 16573798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Appropriateness of colonoscopy using the ASGE guidelines: experience in a large Asian hospital.
Chan TH; Goh KL
Chin J Dig Dis; 2006; 7(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 16412034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An urgent referral strategy for symptomatic patients with suspected colorectal cancer based on a quantitative immunochemical faecal occult blood test.
Rodríguez-Alonso L; Rodríguez-Moranta F; Ruiz-Cerulla A; Lobatón T; Arajol C; Binefa G; Moreno V; Guardiola J
Dig Liver Dis; 2015 Sep; 47(9):797-804. PubMed ID: 26055489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the lower gastrointestinal electronic referral protocol.
John SK; George S; Howell RD; Primrose JN; Fozard JB
Br J Surg; 2008 Apr; 95(4):506-14. PubMed ID: 18196552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Many participants in fecal occult blood test population screening have a higher-than-average risk for colorectal cancer.
Worthley DL; Smith A; Bampton PA; Cole SR; Young GP
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1079-83. PubMed ID: 16957514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The diagnostic performance of scoring systems to identify symptomatic colorectal cancer compared to current referral guidance.
Marshall T; Lancashire R; Sharp D; Peters TJ; Cheng KK; Hamilton W
Gut; 2011 Sep; 60(9):1242-8. PubMed ID: 21357592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of database linkage: are patients at risk of familial colorectal cancer being referred for genetic counselling and testing?
Wong C; Gibbs P; Johns J; Jones I; Faragher I; Lynch E; Macrae F; Lipton L
Intern Med J; 2008 May; 38(5):328-33. PubMed ID: 17916174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting colorectal cancer risk in patients with rectal bleeding.
Robertson R; Campbell C; Weller DP; Elton R; Mant D; Primrose J; Nugent K; Macleod U; Sharma R
Br J Gen Pract; 2006 Oct; 56(531):763-7. PubMed ID: 17007706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Scoping the family history: assessment of Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) in primary care settings--a primer for nurse practitioners.
Maradiegue A; Jasperson K; Edwards QT; Lowstuter K; Weitzel J
J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2008 Feb; 20(2):76-84. PubMed ID: 18271762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The National Breast Referral Guidelines have cut down inappropriate referrals in the under 50s.
Cochrane RA; Davies EL; Singhal H; Sweetland HM; Webster DJ; Monypenny IJ; Lyons K; Mansel RE
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1999 Jun; 25(3):251-4. PubMed ID: 10336802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
