These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16263018)

  • 1. Quality of clinical case note entries: how good are we at achieving set standards?
    Osborn GD; Pike H; Smith M; Winter R; Vaughan-Williams E
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Nov; 87(6):458-60. PubMed ID: 16263018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Setting the records straight--a prospective audit of the quality of case notes in a surgical department.
    Chamisa I; Zulu BM
    S Afr J Surg; 2007 Aug; 45(3):92, 94-5. PubMed ID: 17892187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The quality of operative note taking: an audit using the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines as the gold standard.
    Shayah A; Agada FO; Gunasekaran S; Jassar P; England RJ
    Int J Clin Pract; 2007 Apr; 61(4):677-9. PubMed ID: 17394439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of the CRABEL Score for improving surgical case-note quality.
    Ho MY; Anderson AR; Nijjar A; Thomas C; Goenka A; Hossain J; Curley PJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Nov; 87(6):454-7. PubMed ID: 16263017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inadequacies of hospital medical records.
    Patel AG; Mould T; Webb PJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1993 Jan; 75(1 Suppl):7-9. PubMed ID: 8422161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An audit of the quality of operation notes in two district general hospitals. Are we following Royal College guidelines?
    Baigrie RJ; Dowling BL; Birch D; Dehn TC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1994 Jan; 76(1 Suppl):8-10. PubMed ID: 8017801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer generated operation notes.
    Currall VA; Chesser TJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 137():51-5. PubMed ID: 18560067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standards in Operation Notes--Is It Time to Re-Emphasise Their Importance?
    Cahill KC; Burchette D; Kerin MJ; Kelly JL
    Ir Med J; 2016 Jan; 109(1):332-4. PubMed ID: 26904788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adherence to local hospital guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: a multicentre audit in Dutch hospitals.
    van Kasteren ME; Kullberg BJ; de Boer AS; Mintjes-de Groot J; Gyssens IC
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2003 Jun; 51(6):1389-96. PubMed ID: 12746377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Significant improvement in quality of caesarean section documentation with dedicated operative proforma--completion of the audit cycle.
    Nicopoullos JD; Karrar S; Gour A; Panter K
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Jul; 23(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 12881077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of clinical notes for vascular surgery admissions: a CRABEL score review.
    Suh J; Roake JA; Lewis DR
    ANZ J Surg; 2009 Jul; 79(7-8):539-43. PubMed ID: 19694664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An audit of medical record-keeping in maxillofacial surgery at the University College Hospital, Ibadan using the CRABEL Scoring system.
    Arotiba JT; Akinmoladun VI; Okoje VN
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2006 Mar; 35(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 17209334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Informed consent for vascular intervention.
    Temple-Doig L; Gordon M; Buckenham T; Roake J; Lewis D
    N Z Med J; 2005 Aug; 118(1221):U1630. PubMed ID: 16138168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The quality of operation notes: can simple word processors help?
    O'Bichere A; Sellu D
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1997 Sep; 79(5 Suppl):204-8; discussion 209. PubMed ID: 9496162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The CRABEL score--setting standards in maxillofacial medical note-keeping.
    Dhariwal DK; Gibbons AJ
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Jun; 42(3):200-2. PubMed ID: 15121263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Basingstoke Orthopaedic Database: a high quality accurate information system for audit.
    Barlow IW; Flynn NA; Britton JM
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1994 Nov; 76(6 Suppl):285-7. PubMed ID: 7598401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An audit of the quality of operation notes in an otolaryngology unit.
    Bateman ND; Carney AS; Gibbin KP
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1999 Apr; 44(2):94-5. PubMed ID: 10230203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An audit of operative notes: facts and ways to improve.
    Lefter LP; Walker SR; Dewhurst F; Turner RW
    ANZ J Surg; 2008 Sep; 78(9):800-2. PubMed ID: 18844913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An audit of operative notes in general surgery at Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (P.I.M.S.), Pakistan. Do we follow the Royal College of Surgeons (England) guidelines?
    Atif QAA
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2020 Mar; 70(3):491-493. PubMed ID: 32207432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical hospital audit of record keeping (SHARK)--a new audit tool for the improvement in surgical record keeping.
    Grewal P
    J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(3):373-6. PubMed ID: 23618448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.