These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16263127)

  • 1. Comparative in vitro study on the long-term performance of cemented hip stems: validation of a protocol to discriminate between "good" and "bad" designs.
    Paul JP
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):395; author reply 395-6. PubMed ID: 16263127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative in vitro study on the long term performance of cemented hip stems: validation of a protocol to discriminate between "good" and "bad" designs.
    Cristofolini L; Teutonico AS; Monti L; Cappello A; Toni A
    J Biomech; 2003 Nov; 36(11):1603-15. PubMed ID: 14522201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture load for periprosthetic femoral fractures in cemented versus uncemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study.
    Thomsen MN; Jakubowitz E; Seeger JB; Lee C; Kretzer JP; Clarius M
    Orthopedics; 2008 Jul; 31(7):653. PubMed ID: 19292385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
    Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biphasic constitutive laws for biological interface evolution.
    Büchler P; Pioletti DP; Rakotomanana LR
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2003 Apr; 1(4):239-49. PubMed ID: 14586693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A proximal femoral implant preserves physiological bone deformation: a biomechanical investigation in cadaveric bones.
    Macdonald W; Carlsson LV; Jacobsson CM; Lee TQ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 12578218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thermal factors affecting stability and durability of cemented metal prostheses.
    Iesaka K
    J Biomech; 2004 Mar; 37(3):422. PubMed ID: 14757465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of three-dimensional shape optimization on the probabilistic response of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
    Nicolella DP; Thacker BH; Katoozian H; Davy DT
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1265-78. PubMed ID: 15961093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of cementing the pin on resistance to fracture in hip resurfacing.
    Schlegel UJ; Siewe J; Bitsch RG; Koebke J; Eysel P; Morlock MM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Feb; 26(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 20934792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A preliminary hip joint simulator study of the migration of a cemented femoral stem.
    Liu C; Green SM; Watkins ND; Gregg PJ; McCaskie AW
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 12666780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of the fixation stiffness of some femoral stems of different designs.
    Sakai R; Kanai N; Itoman M; Mabuchi K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):370-8. PubMed ID: 16431001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Partially cemented AncaDualFit hip stems do not fail in simulated active patients.
    Cristofolini L; Erani P; Teutonico AS; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Feb; 22(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 17070631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intramedullary femoral nails: one or two lag screws? A preliminary study.
    Paul JP
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 May; 26(4):359; author reply 360. PubMed ID: 15121063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primary stability of an anatomical cementless hip stem: a statistical analysis.
    Viceconti M; Brusi G; Pancanti A; Cristofolini L
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1169-79. PubMed ID: 15927191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geometric element analysis of fretting in a model of a modular femoral component of a hip implant.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 14757952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thin cement mantles surrounding femoral hip implants might not be deleterious in all cases.
    Scheerlinck T; Janssen D; Verdonschot N
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 May; 23(4):500-1; author reply 501-3. PubMed ID: 18207616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of undersizing on the long-term stability of the Exeter hip stem: A comparative in vitro study.
    Cristofolini L; Erani P; Bialoblocka-Juszczyk E; Ohashi H; Iida S; Minato I; Viceconti M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Nov; 25(9):899-908. PubMed ID: 20659780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early cement damage around a femoral stem is concentrated at the cement/bone interface.
    Race A; Miller MA; Ayers DC; Mann KA
    J Biomech; 2003 Apr; 36(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 12600339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can the rasp be used to predict intra-operatively the primary stability that can be achieved by press-fitting the stem in cementless hip arthroplasty?
    Varini E; Cristofolini L; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 May; 23(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 18068878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical simulation of muscle loading on the proximal femur: analysis of cemented femoral component migration with and without muscle loading.
    Britton JR; Walsh LA; Prendergast PJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Aug; 18(7):637-46. PubMed ID: 12880711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.