These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16263615)

  • 1. Cement-implant interface gaps explain the poor results of CMW3 for femoral stem fixation: A cadaver study of migration, fatigue and mantle morphology.
    Race A; Miller MA; Clarke MT; Mann KA
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Oct; 76(5):679-87. PubMed ID: 16263615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of low-viscosity cement on mantle morphology and femoral stem micromotion: a cadaver model with simulated blood flow.
    Race A; Miller MA; Clarke MT; Mann KA; Higham PA
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Aug; 77(4):607-16. PubMed ID: 16929438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early cement damage around a femoral stem is concentrated at the cement/bone interface.
    Race A; Miller MA; Ayers DC; Mann KA
    J Biomech; 2003 Apr; 36(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 12600339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can plate osteosynthesis of periprosthethic femoral fractures cause cement mantle failure around a stable hip stem? A biomechanical analysis.
    Giesinger K; Ebneter L; Day RE; Stoffel KK; Yates PJ; Kuster MS
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1308-12. PubMed ID: 24439999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stem-cement porosity may explain early loosening of cemented femoral hip components: experimental-computational in vitro study.
    Mann KA; Damron LA; Miller MA; Race A; Clarke MT; Cleary RJ
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Mar; 25(3):340-50. PubMed ID: 17149748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
    Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro measurement of interface micromotion and crack in cemented total hip arthroplasty systems with different surface roughness.
    Choi D; Park Y; Yoon YS; Masri BA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Jan; 25(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 19744754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of cement mantle thickness and stem geometry on fatigue damage in two different cemented hip femoral prostheses.
    Ramos A; Simões JA
    J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2602-10. PubMed ID: 19660758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of cement viscosity on the early migration of a tapered polished femoral stem.
    Glyn-Jones S; Hicks J; Alfaro-Adrian J; Gill HS; McLardy-Smith P; Murray DW
    Int Orthop; 2003; 27(6):362-5. PubMed ID: 12915952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of cement viscosity and cement mantle thickness on migration of the Exeter total hip prosthesis.
    Nelissen RG; Garling EH; Valstar ER
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jun; 20(4):521-8. PubMed ID: 16124971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The type of cement and failure of total hip replacements.
    Espehaug B; Furnes O; Havelin LI; Engesaeter LB; Vollset SE
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2002 Aug; 84(6):832-8. PubMed ID: 12211673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of circular statistics in the study of crack distribution around cemented femoral components.
    Mann KA; Gupta S; Race A; Miller MA; Cleary RJ
    J Biomech; 2003 Aug; 36(8):1231-4. PubMed ID: 12831752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of femoral neck length, stem size, and body weight on strains in the proximal cement mantle.
    Harrington MA; O'Connor DO; Lozynsky AJ; Kovach I; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Apr; 84(4):573-9. PubMed ID: 11940617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cement microcracks in thin-mantle regions after in vitro fatigue loading.
    Mann KA; Gupta S; Race A; Miller MA; Cleary RJ; Ayers DC
    J Arthroplasty; 2004 Aug; 19(5):605-12. PubMed ID: 15284982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stem surface roughness alters creep induced subsidence and 'taper-lock' in a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
    Norman TL; Thyagarajan G; Saligrama VC; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
    J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1325-33. PubMed ID: 11522312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using 'subcement' to simulate the long-term fatigue response of cemented femoral stems in a cadaver model: could a novel preclinical screening test have caught the Exeter matt problem?
    Race A; Miller MA; Mann KA
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(4):585-97. PubMed ID: 20476506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
    O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro interface and cement mantle analysis of different femur stem designs.
    Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Siebert CH; Andereya S; Mueller-Rath R; Maus U; Mumme T
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(9):2021-8. PubMed ID: 18514207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantification of stem-cement interfacial gaps: in vitro CT analysis of Charnley-Kerboul and Lubinus SPII femoral hip implants.
    Scheerlinck T; Vandenbussche P; Noble PC; Dunn JS
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Jan; 90(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 18160511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
    Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.