BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

595 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16264250)

  • 1. Monte Carlo simulations of a nozzle for the treatment of ocular tumours with high-energy proton beams.
    Newhauser W; Koch N; Hummel S; Ziegler M; Titt U
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(22):5229-49. PubMed ID: 16264250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A beam source model for scanned proton beams.
    Kimstrand P; Traneus E; Ahnesjö A; Grusell E; Glimelius B; Tilly N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3151-68. PubMed ID: 17505095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monte Carlo simulations for configuring and testing an analytical proton dose-calculation algorithm.
    Newhauser W; Fontenot J; Zheng Y; Polf J; Titt U; Koch N; Zhang X; Mohan R
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4569-84. PubMed ID: 17634651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
    Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A particle track-repeating algorithm for proton beam dose calculation.
    Li JS; Shahine B; Fourkal E; Ma CM
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):1001-10. PubMed ID: 15798272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monte Carlo investigation of the low-dose envelope from scanned proton pencil beams.
    Sawakuchi GO; Titt U; Mirkovic D; Ciangaru G; Zhu XR; Sahoo N; Gillin MT; Mohan R
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):711-21. PubMed ID: 20071752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Virtual commissioning of a treatment planning system for proton therapy of ocular cancers.
    Koch N; Newhauser W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):159-63. PubMed ID: 16381705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A pencil beam algorithm for intensity modulated proton therapy derived from Monte Carlo simulations.
    Soukup M; Fippel M; Alber M
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):5089-104. PubMed ID: 16237243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calculations of neutron dose equivalent exposures from range-modulated proton therapy beams.
    Polf JC; Newhauser WD
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3859-73. PubMed ID: 16077232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assigning nonelastic nuclear interaction cross sections to Hounsfield units for Monte Carlo treatment planning of proton beams.
    Palmans H; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):991-1000. PubMed ID: 15798271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo investigation of collimator scatter of proton-therapy beams produced using the passive scattering method.
    Titt U; Zheng Y; Vassiliev ON; Newhauser WD
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):487-504. PubMed ID: 18185001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo dose calculations for spot scanned proton therapy.
    Tourovsky A; Lomax AJ; Schneider U; Pedroni E
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):971-81. PubMed ID: 15798269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Monte Carlo SRNA-VOX code for 3D proton dose distribution in voxelized geometry using CT data.
    Ilić RD; Spasić-Jokić V; Belicev P; Dragović M
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):1011-7. PubMed ID: 15798273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods.
    Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dosimetric verification of IMRT treatment planning using Monte Carlo simulations for prostate cancer.
    Yang J; Li J; Chen L; Price R; McNeeley S; Qin L; Wang L; Xiong W; Ma CM
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):869-78. PubMed ID: 15798261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA.
    Ahmad M; Deng J; Lund MW; Chen Z; Kimmett J; Moran MS; Nath R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 19098353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical use of a commercial Monte Carlo treatment planning system for electron beams.
    Cygler JE; Lochrin C; Daskalov GM; Howard M; Zohr R; Esche B; Eapen L; Grimard L; Caudrelier JM
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):1029-34. PubMed ID: 15798275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monte Carlo modelling of the treatment line of the Proton Therapy Center in Orsay.
    Stankovskiy A; Kerhoas-Cavata S; Ferrand R; Nauraye C; Demarzi L
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(8):2377-94. PubMed ID: 19321923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Density heterogeneities and the influence of multiple Coulomb and nuclear scatterings on the Bragg peak distal edge of proton therapy beams.
    Sawakuchi GO; Titt U; Mirkovic D; Mohan R
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4605-19. PubMed ID: 18678928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The importance of accurate linear accelerator head modelling for IMRT Monte Carlo calculations.
    Reynaert N; Coghe M; De Smedt B; Paelinck L; Vanderstraeten B; De Gersem W; Van Duyse B; De Wagter C; De Neve W; Thierens H
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):831-46. PubMed ID: 15798258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.