These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1626518)

  • 1. Morphologic findings in explanted Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthetic valves.
    McGonagle-Wolff K; Schoen FJ
    Am J Cardiol; 1992 Jul; 70(2):263-4. PubMed ID: 1626518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mode of failure of the Mitroflow pericardial valve.
    Leandri J; Bertrand P; Mazzucotelli JP; Loisance D
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1992 Nov; 1(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 1341633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
    Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is degenerative calcification of the native aortic valve similar to calcification of bioprosthetic heart valves?
    David TE; Ivanov J
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Oct; 126(4):939-41. PubMed ID: 14566227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental evaluation of the mitroflow pericardial heart valve prosthesis. Part II. Pathologic examination.
    Hassoulas J; Rose AG
    Angiology; 1988 Aug; 39(8):733-41. PubMed ID: 3421507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Durability after aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow versus the Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis: a single-centre experience in 2393 patients.
    Nielsen PH; Hjortdal V; Modrau IS; Jensen H; Kimose HH; Terp K; Poulsen SH; Smerup M; Nielsen SL
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1705-10. PubMed ID: 26984983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The failure modes of biological prosthetic heart valves.
    Butany J; Leask R
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2001; 11(3-4):115-35. PubMed ID: 11921659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Formation of cartilage in bioprosthetic cardiac valves implanted in sheep: a morphologic study.
    Arbustini E; Jones M; Ferrans VJ
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Sep; 52(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 6193703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Surgical pathology analysis of the causes of failure of 48 bioprosthetic heart valves in 40 Chinese cases].
    Duan XJ; Wang HY; Xu JP; Li L; Xu HY; Wang QZ
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 54(9):710-5. PubMed ID: 27587216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis: structured failure at 4.5 years.
    Butany J; Feng T; Suri R; Law K; Christakis G
    Cardiovasc Pathol; 2012; 21(6):506-10. PubMed ID: 23137773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pathologic findings in explanted clinical bioprosthetic valves fabricated from photooxidized bovine pericardium.
    Schoen FJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Mar; 7(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9587858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term results of the Mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis in over 800 patients: limited durability and mechanisms of dysfunction.
    Ius F; Schulz J; Roumieh M; Fleissner F; Ismail I; Tudorache I; Warnecke G; Martens A; Shrestha M; Boethig D; Haverich A; Cebotari S
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Aug; 52(2):264-271. PubMed ID: 28838100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Degenerative processes in bioprosthetic mitral valves in juvenile pigs.
    Honge JL; Funder JA; Pedersen TB; Kronborg MB; Hasenkam JM
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 May; 6():72. PubMed ID: 21569636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Porcine aortic vs. bovine pericardial valves: a morphologic study of the Xenomedica and Mitroflow bioprostheses.
    Goffin YA; Bartik MA; Hilbert SL
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():213-22. PubMed ID: 3727689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Long-term morphopathologic observations on replaced bioprosthetic valves].
    Huang ST; Chen HZ; Ren ZY
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 1988 Aug; 16(4):202-3, 253. PubMed ID: 3229328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accelerated degeneration of a bovine pericardial bioprosthetic aortic valve in children and young adults.
    Saleeb SF; Newburger JW; Geva T; Baird CW; Gauvreau K; Padera RF; Del Nido PJ; Borisuk MJ; Sanders SP; Mayer JE
    Circulation; 2014 Jul; 130(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 24756063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physicochemical characterization of natural and bioprosthetic heart valve calcific deposits: implications for prevention.
    Tomazic BB; Edwards WD; Schoen FJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1995 Aug; 60(2 Suppl):S322-7. PubMed ID: 7646181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biaxial strain distributions in explanted porcine bioprosthetic valves.
    Adamczyk MM; Vesely I
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):688-95. PubMed ID: 12358406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relation of calcification to torn leaflets of spontaneously degenerated porcine bioprosthetic valves.
    Stein PD; Kemp SR; Riddle JM; Lee MW; Lewis JW; Magilligan DJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1985 Aug; 40(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 4026449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lack of durability of the Mitroflow valve does not affect survival.
    Houel R; Le Besnerais P; Soustelle C; Kirsch M; Hillion ML; Loisance D
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jul; 8(4):368-74; discussion 374-5. PubMed ID: 10461235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.