These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1626532)

  • 1. Variations in bracket placement in the preadjusted orthodontic appliance.
    Balut N; Klapper L; Sandrik J; Bowman D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jul; 102(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 1626532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of white spot lesion formation between a self-ligating bracket and a conventional preadjusted straight wire bracket.
    Polat Ö; Gökçelik A; Arman A; Arhun N
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):e46-50. PubMed ID: 19641768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of positioning three types of self-ligating brackets compared with a conventionally ligating bracket.
    Birdsall J; Hunt NP; Sabbah W; Moseley HC
    J Orthod; 2012 Mar; 39(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 22433325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Straight wire: the next generation.
    Creekmore TD; Kunik RL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):8-20. PubMed ID: 8257493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The crown bracket bonding system.
    Heiser W; Schendell C
    J Clin Orthod; 2001 Feb; 35(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 11314484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Indirect laminate veneers as an indirect bonding method.
    Miyazawa K; Miwa H; Goto S; Kondo T
    World J Orthod; 2004; 5(4):308-11. PubMed ID: 15633376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. KommonBase - A precise direct bonding system for labial fixed appliances.
    Miyashita W; Komori A; Takemoto K
    Int Orthod; 2017 Sep; 15(3):452-466. PubMed ID: 28778728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of accuracy in bracket positioning between two techniques--localizing the centre of the clinical crown and measuring the distance from the incisal edge.
    Armstrong D; Shen G; Petocz P; Darendeliler MA
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):430-6. PubMed ID: 17660488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the accuracy of bracket placement between direct and indirect bonding techniques.
    Koo BC; Chung CH; Vanarsdall RL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):346-51. PubMed ID: 10474109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new device (FAQ.FIX®) for orthodontic bracket placement in straight wire technique.
    Mazzeo F; Marchese E; Assumma V; Sepe J; Perillo L
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Aug; 14():23. PubMed ID: 24325941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects on the dental arch form using a preadjusted appliance with premolar extraction in Class I crowding.
    Miyake H; Ryu T; Himuro T
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1043-9. PubMed ID: 18947268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to deciduous and permanent teeth.
    Endo T; Ozoe R; Shinkai K; Shimomura J; Katoh Y; Shimooka S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 18675200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Customized brackets and archwires for lingual orthodontic treatment.
    Wiechmann D; Rummel V; Thalheim A; Simon JS; Wiechmann L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Nov; 124(5):593-9. PubMed ID: 14614428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bond failure of gingivally offset mandibular premolar brackets: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Thind BS; Stirrups DR; Hewage S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 19121500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the vertical accuracy of bracket placement with the Boone gauge.
    Mota Júnior SL; de Andrade Vitral J; Schmitberger CA; Machado DB; Avelar JC; Fraga MR; da Silva Campos MJ; Vitral RW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Nov; 148(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 26522043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative clinical trial of a compomer and a resin adhesive for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; McCluskey LA; McAuley F; Creanor SL; Newell J; Love J
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Jun; 70(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 10926433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized clinical trial comparing the accuracy of direct versus indirect bracket placement.
    Hodge TM; Dhopatkar AA; Rock WP; Spary DJ
    J Orthod; 2004 Jun; 31(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 15210929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MARA appliance.
    Rondeau B
    Funct Orthod; 2002; 19(2):4-12, 14-6. PubMed ID: 12192852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of orthodontic bracket base diameter and mesh size on bond strength.
    Cucu M; Driessen CH; Ferreira PD
    SADJ; 2002 Jan; 57(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 11901581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of self-etchant pH on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Ostby AW; Bishara SE; Denehy GE; Laffoon JF; Warren JJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18675201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.