These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16265854)

  • 1. Screw- vs cement-implant-retained restorations: an experimental study in the Beagle. Part 1. Screw and abutment loosening.
    Assenza B; Scarano A; Leghissa G; Carusi G; Thams U; Roman FS; Piattelli A
    J Oral Implantol; 2005; 31(5):242-6. PubMed ID: 16265854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screw vs cement-implant-retained restorations: an experimental study in the beagle. Part 2. Immunohistochemical evaluation of the peri-implant tissues.
    Assenza B; Artese L; Scarano A; Rubini C; Perrotti V; Piattelli M; Thams U; San Roman F; Piccirilli M; Piattelli A
    J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16526575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
    Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns.
    Freitas AC; Bonfante EA; Rocha EP; Silva NR; Marotta L; Coelho PG
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 119(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21726295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported partial restorations.
    Nissan J; Narobai D; Gross O; Ghelfan O; Chaushu G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1102-7. PubMed ID: 22010095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cement- and screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: up to 10 years of follow-up of a new design.
    Preiskel HW; Tsolka P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 14982360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survival and complication rates of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Nickenig HJ; Schäfer C; Spiekermann H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 16958689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wave analysis of implant screw loosening using an air cylindrical cyclic loading device.
    Lee J; Kim YS; Kim CW; Han JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 12447217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A technique for locating implant abutment screws of posterior cement-retained metal-ceramic restorations with ceramic occlusal surfaces.
    Schwedhelm ER; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 16473092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A technique for repairing a loosening abutment screw for a cement-retained implant prosthesis.
    Patil PG
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Dec; 20(8):652-5. PubMed ID: 21883632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fabrication of a cement- and screw-retained multiunit implant restoration.
    Uludag B; Celik G
    J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(5):248-50. PubMed ID: 17069169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cement-retained implant-supported fixed partial dentures: a 6-month to 3-year follow-up.
    Singer A; Serfaty V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(5):645-9. PubMed ID: 8908864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A clinical study of the efficacy of gold-tite square abutment screws in cement-retained implant restorations.
    Drago CJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 12705307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections.
    Piattelli A; Scarano A; Paolantonio M; Assenza B; Leghissa GC; Di Bonaventura G; Catamo G; Piccolomini R
    J Periodontol; 2001 Sep; 72(9):1146-50. PubMed ID: 11577944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of engaging the screw access channel of an implant abutment with a cement-retained restoration.
    Naik S; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 19141047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Fracture of implant abutment screws and removal of a remaining screw piece].
    van den Broeke SM; de Baat C
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2008 Jul; 115(7):360-7. PubMed ID: 18686561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations.
    Wadhwani C; Chung KH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro stress analyses of dental implants supporting screw-retained and cement-retained prostheses.
    Kim WD; Jacobson Z; Nathanson D
    Implant Dent; 1999; 8(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 10635156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A screwless and cementless technique for the restoration of single-tooth implants: a retrospective cohort study.
    Urdaneta RA; Marincola M; Weed M; Chuang SK
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):562-71. PubMed ID: 18761575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.