These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16266109)

  • 1. Absorbed dose to water reference dosimetry using solid phantoms in the context of absorbed-dose protocols.
    Seuntjens J; Olivares M; Evans M; Podgorsak E
    Med Phys; 2005 Sep; 32(9):2945-53. PubMed ID: 16266109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A round-robin gamma stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry interinstitution comparison of calibration protocols.
    Drzymala RE; Alvarez PE; Bednarz G; Bourland JD; DeWerd LA; Ma L; Meltsner SG; Neyman G; Novotny J; Petti PL; Rivard MJ; Shiu AS; Goetsch SJ
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6745-56. PubMed ID: 26520764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
    Araki F; Kubo HD
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of different calibration protocols and ionization chambers for low-energy surface brachytherapy dosimetry.
    Candela-Juan C; Vijande J; García-Martínez T; Niatsetski Y; Nauta G; Schuurman J; Ouhib Z; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4954-64. PubMed ID: 26233221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study of the influence of phantom material and size on the calibration of ionization chambers in terms of absorbed dose to water.
    Arib M; Medjadj T; Boudouma Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 7(3):55-64. PubMed ID: 17533342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technical note: Influence of the phantom material on the absorbed-dose energy dependence of the EBT3 radiochromic film for photons in the energy range 3 keV-18 MeV.
    Hermida-López M; Lüdemann L; Flühs A; Brualla L
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):112103. PubMed ID: 25370654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of kQmsr,Q0fmsr,fref factors for ion chambers used in the calibration of Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion model using EGSnrc and PENELOPE Monte Carlo codes.
    Mirzakhanian L; Benmakhlouf H; Tessier F; Seuntjens J
    Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1748-1757. PubMed ID: 29468677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absorbed-dose beam quality conversion factors for cylindrical chambers in high energy photon beams.
    Seuntjens JP; Ross CK; Shortt KR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2763-79. PubMed ID: 11190960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calibration of the Gamma Knife Perfexion using TG-21 and the solid water Leksell dosimetry phantom.
    McDonald D; Yount C; Koch N; Ashenafi M; Peng J; Vanek K
    Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1685-93. PubMed ID: 21520881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam quality conversion factors for several ion chamber types.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111701. PubMed ID: 25370615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Absorbed dose measurement of photon beam with Farmer-type ionization chambers in Japanese dosimetry protocols].
    Fujisaki T; Hiraoka T; Osawa A; Nakajima M; Kuwabara A; Yokoyama K; Saitoh H; Tomaru T; Inada T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2004; 24(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 15226645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of AAPM Addendum to TG-51, IAEA TRS-398, and JSMP 12: Calibration of photon beams in water.
    Kinoshita N; Oguchi H; Nishimoto Y; Adachi T; Shioura H; Kimura H; Doi K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):271-278. PubMed ID: 28771919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How water equivalent are water-equivalent solid materials for output calibration of photon and electron beams?
    Tello VM; Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 1995 Jul; 22(7):1177-89. PubMed ID: 7565393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of ionization chamber absorbed dose k(Q) factors in megavoltage photon beams.
    McEwen MR
    Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2179-93. PubMed ID: 20527552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new approach to electron-beam reference dosimetry.
    Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1998 Mar; 25(3):310-20. PubMed ID: 9547498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.
    Ding GX; Cygler JE; Kwok CB
    Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental validation of recommended msr-correction factors for the calibration of Leksell Gamma Knife
    Mirzakhanian L; Sarfehnia A; Seuntjens J
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Mar; 65(6):065003. PubMed ID: 31914427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.