These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16266170)

  • 1. Psychophysical tuning curves at very high frequencies.
    Yasin I; Plack CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2498-506. PubMed ID: 16266170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions, threshold microstructure, and psychophysical tuning over a wide frequency range in humans.
    Baiduc RR; Lee J; Dhar S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):300-14. PubMed ID: 24437770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions for hearing threshold estimation and differentiation between middle-ear and cochlear disorders in neonates.
    Janssen T; Gehr DD; Klein A; Müller J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):2969-79. PubMed ID: 15957767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychoacoustic analyses of cochlear mechanisms in tinnitus patients with normal auditory thresholds.
    Buzo BC; Carvallo RM
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 24168288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of psychometric-function slopes for forward-masked tones to investigate cochlear nonlinearity.
    Schairer KS; Messersmith J; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2196-215. PubMed ID: 19062859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA; Schroder AC; Wojtczak M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2045-64. PubMed ID: 11681384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying dead regions in the cochlea: psychophysical tuning curves and tone detection in threshold-equalizing noise.
    Summers V; Molis MR; Müsch H; Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 12677110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1233-49. PubMed ID: 1787705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.
    Oxenham AJ; Shera CA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2003 Dec; 4(4):541-54. PubMed ID: 14716510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal overshoot in simultaneous-masked psychophysical tuning curves from normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kimberley BP; Nelson DA; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1660-5. PubMed ID: 2708681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Musical experience sharpens human cochlear tuning.
    Bidelman GM; Nelms C; Bhagat SP
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():40-46. PubMed ID: 26900073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Compression estimates using behavioral and otoacoustic emission measures.
    Williams EJ; Bacon SP
    Hear Res; 2005 Mar; 201(1-2):44-54. PubMed ID: 15721560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory filter nonlinearity across frequency using simultaneous notched-noise masking.
    Baker RJ; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jan; 119(1):454-62. PubMed ID: 16454300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The intensitive DL of tones: dependence of signal/masker ratio on tone level and on spectrum of added noise.
    Greenwood DD
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):1-39. PubMed ID: 8458743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interrelations between psychoacoustical tuning curves and spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Micheyl C; Collet L
    Scand Audiol; 1994; 23(3):171-8. PubMed ID: 7997834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency selectivity of the human cochlea: Suppression tuning of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Manley GA; van Dijk P
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():53-62. PubMed ID: 27139323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Masker phase effects in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: evidence for peripheral compression at low signal frequencies.
    Oxenham AJ; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2248-57. PubMed ID: 15532656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Agreement between psychophysical tuning curves and the threshold equalizing noise test in dead region identification.
    Warnaar B; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):456-64. PubMed ID: 22429189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of cochlear impairment and equivalent-threshold masking on psychoacoustic tuning curves.
    Florentine M
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):241-53. PubMed ID: 1449429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.