These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16266183)

  • 1. Robust acoustic object detection.
    Amit Y; Koloydenko A; Niyogi P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2634-48. PubMed ID: 16266183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Classification of stop place in consonant-vowel contexts using feature extrapolation of acoustic-phonetic features in telephone speech.
    Lee JW; Choi JY; Kang HG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1536-46. PubMed ID: 22352523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unfolding of phonetic information over time: a database of Dutch diphone perception.
    Smits R; Warner N; McQueen JM; Cutler A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):563-74. PubMed ID: 12558292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phonetic tone signals phonological quantity and word structure.
    Vainio M; Järvikivi J; Aalto D; Suni A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1313-21. PubMed ID: 20815466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic changes in the production of lexical stress during Lombard speech.
    Arciuli J; Simpson BS; Vogel AP; Ballard KJ
    Lang Speech; 2014 Jun; 57(Pt 2):149-62. PubMed ID: 25102603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic-phonetic features for the automatic classification of fricatives.
    Ali AM; Van der Spiegel J; Mueller P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2217-35. PubMed ID: 11386573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic characteristics of Mandarin esophageal speech.
    Liu H; Wan M; Wang S; Wang X; Lu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1016-25. PubMed ID: 16158657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of the closure-burst transitions of stops and affricates in continuous speech using the plosion index.
    Ananthapadmanabha TV; Prathosh AP; Ramakrishnan AG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):460-71. PubMed ID: 24437786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech perception.
    Diehl RL; Lotto AJ; Holt LL
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2004; 55():149-79. PubMed ID: 14744213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sine-wave and noise-vocoded sine-wave speech in a tone language: Acoustic details matter.
    Rosen S; Hui SN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3698-702. PubMed ID: 26723325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Loudness predicts prominence: fundamental frequency lends little.
    Kochanski G; Grabe E; Coleman J; Rosner B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1038-54. PubMed ID: 16158659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Jin SH
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sonority and syllabicity: acoustic correlates of perception.
    Price PJ
    Phonetica; 1981; 37(5-6):327-43. PubMed ID: 7280034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of language experience on pre-categorical perception: Distinguishing general from specialized processes in speech perception.
    Iverson P; Wagner A; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1799. PubMed ID: 27106328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.
    Villacorta VM; Perkell JS; Guenther FH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2306-19. PubMed ID: 17902866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occurrence Frequencies of Acoustic Patterns of Vocal Fry in American English Speakers.
    Abdelli-Beruh NB; Drugman T; Red Owl RH
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):759.e11-759.e20. PubMed ID: 26547606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of category goodness of /t/ and /k/ in typical and misarticulated children's speech.
    Strömbergsson S; Salvi G; House D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3422-35. PubMed ID: 26093431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The mean matters: effects of statistically defined nonspeech spectral distributions on speech categorization.
    Holt LL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Nov; 120(5 Pt 1):2801-17. PubMed ID: 17091133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus variability and the phonetic relevance hypothesis: effects of variability in speaking style, fundamental frequency, and speaking rate on spoken word identification.
    Sommers MS; Barcroft J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2406-16. PubMed ID: 16642853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.