BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16266576)

  • 1. [The Danish Colorectal Cancer Database].
    Harling H; Nickelsen T
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Oct; 167(44):4187-9. PubMed ID: 16266576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do patient characteristics, disease, or treatment explain social inequality in survival from colorectal cancer?
    Frederiksen BL; Osler M; Harling H; Ladelund S; Jørgensen T
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Oct; 69(7):1107-15. PubMed ID: 19695753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The completeness and quality of the Danish Colorectal Cancer clinical database on colorectal cancer].
    Nickelsen TN; Harling H; Kronborg O; Bülow S; Jørgensen T
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Aug; 166(36):3092-5. PubMed ID: 15387308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data from a national lung cancer registry contributes to improve outcome and quality of surgery: Danish results.
    Jakobsen E; Palshof T; Osterlind K; Pilegaard H
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):348-52; discussion 352. PubMed ID: 19070503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Colorectal cancer surgery 2000-2008: evaluation of a prospective database.
    Due SL; Wattchow DA; Sweeney JL; Milliken L; Luke CG
    ANZ J Surg; 2012 Jun; 82(6):412-9. PubMed ID: 22537147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Danish National Guidelines for diagnostic strategy of patients with colorectal cancer symptoms].
    Serup-Branda L; Laurberg JM; Bjerregaard NC; Laurberg S
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Dec; 170(49):4058. PubMed ID: 19087753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New registry: National Cancer Patient Registry--Colorectal Cancer.
    Wendy L; Radzi M
    Med J Malaysia; 2008 Sep; 63 Suppl C():57-8. PubMed ID: 19230248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Survival after rectal cancer has improved considerably in Denmark--secondary publication].
    Bülow S; Harling H; Iversen LH; Ladelund S;
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Sep; 171(38):2735-8. PubMed ID: 19771662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Future organisation of colorectal cancer surgery in Denmark].
    Rasmussen PC; Bülow S
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Oct; 167(44):4191-2. PubMed ID: 16266578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mixed adherence to clinical practice guidelines for colorectal cancer in the Southern Netherlands in 2002.
    Lemmens VE; Verheij CD; Janssen-Heijnen ML; Rutten HJ; Coebergh JW;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2006 Mar; 32(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 16387468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group].
    Mouridsen HT; Møller S; Christiansen P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2012 Oct; 174(42):2532. PubMed ID: 23079435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The national drug interactions database].
    Aagaard L; Kristensen MB
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Aug; 167(35):3283-6. PubMed ID: 16138969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Danish national strategy for selective use of colonoscopy in symptomatic outpatients without known risk factors for colorectal cancer.
    Bjerregaard NC; Tøttrup A; Sørensen HT; Laurberg S
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 17327943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Establishment of a national Danish hysterectomy database: preliminary report on the first 13,425 hysterectomies.
    Hansen CT; Møller C; Daugbjerg S; Utzon J; Kehlet H; Ottesen B;
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(5):546-57. PubMed ID: 18446539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 2: long-term outcome.
    Iversen LH; Harling H; Laurberg S; Wille-Jørgensen P;
    Colorectal Dis; 2007 Jan; 9(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 17181844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group--1998 activities].
    Wille-Jørgensen PA; Kallehave FL; Andersen H; Fjeldmark I
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1999 Oct; 161(43):5905-6. PubMed ID: 10778323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The 2-week wait referral system, etc.: flogging a dead horse?
    Milewski PJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):858. PubMed ID: 17509045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing treatment trends for colorectal cancer in clinical database and cancer registry data: implications for monitoring cancer care.
    Sehgal A; Davies EA
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2011 Jun; 17(3):486-92. PubMed ID: 20626537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clinical databases in social epidemiological research].
    Osler M
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 May; 171(22):1843-6. PubMed ID: 19486613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linking data from hospital and cancer registry databases: should this be standard practice?
    Field K; Kosmider S; Johns J; Farrugia H; Hastie I; Croxford M; Chapman M; Harold M; Murigu N; Gibbs P
    Intern Med J; 2010 Aug; 40(8):566-73. PubMed ID: 19460066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.