These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Evaluation of cuff-wrapping methods for the determination of ankle blood pressure. Takahashi O; Shimbo T; Rahman M; Okamoto S; Tanaka Y; Fukui T Blood Press Monit; 2006 Feb; 11(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 16410737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ankle blood pressure measured by automatic oscillotonometry: a comparison with Doppler pressure measurements. Adiseshiah M; Cross FW; Belsham PA Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1987 Nov; 69(6):271-3. PubMed ID: 3426091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of ankle-brachial pressure index measurements using an automated oscillometric device with the standard Doppler ultrasound technique. Ramanathan A; Conaghan PJ; Jenkinson AD; Bishop CR ANZ J Surg; 2003 Mar; 73(3):105-8. PubMed ID: 12608969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of the oscillometric blood pressure monitors: Dinamap 1846 and HP M-1008B]. Papadopoulos G; Mieke S; Kuhn HJ; Apenburg C Anaesthesist; 1996 May; 45(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 8779405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Best reproducibility of the ankle-arm index was calculated using Doppler and dividing highest ankle pressure by highest arm pressure. Atsma F; Bartelink ML; Grobbee DE; van der Schouw YT J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 58(12):1282-8. PubMed ID: 16291473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variation of method for measurement of brachial artery pressure significantly affects ankle-brachial pressure index values. Jeelani NU; Braithwaite BD; Tomlin C; MacSweeney ST Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2000 Jul; 20(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 10906293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the Dinamap 8100 and Omron M1 blood pressure monitors for use in children. Barker ME; Shiell AW; Law CM Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 14(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 10791663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the HEM-780REL with easy wrap cuff for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. Viera AJ; Hinderliter AL Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):335-8. PubMed ID: 17890973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurements of blood pressure with various techniques in daily practice: uncertainty in diagnosing office hypertension with short-term in-hospital registration of blood pressure. Braun HJ; Rabouw H; Werner H; van Montfrans GA; de Stigter C; Zwinderman AH Blood Press Monit; 1999 Apr; 4(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 10450115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of an automatic oscillometric method and of various cuffs for the measurement of arterial pressure in the neonate. Pellegrini-Caliumi G; Agostino R; Nodari S; Maffei G; Moretti C; Bucci G Acta Paediatr Scand; 1982 Sep; 71(5):791-7. PubMed ID: 7180448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of high-definition and conventional oscillometric blood pressure measurement in anaesthetised dogs using ACVIM guidelines. Wernick M; Doherr M; Howard J; Francey T J Small Anim Pract; 2010 Jun; 51(6):318-24. PubMed ID: 20492450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The reliability of the ankle-brachial index in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and the NHLBI Family Heart Study (FHS). Weatherley BD; Chambless LE; Heiss G; Catellier DJ; Ellison CR BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2006 Feb; 6():7. PubMed ID: 16504033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of blood pressure instrument and cuff side on blood pressure reading in pregnant women in the lateral recumbent position. Kinsella SM Int J Obstet Anesth; 2006 Oct; 15(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 16945515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Continuous, non-invasive volume-clamp blood pressure: determinants of performance. Lal SK; Mihailidou AS; Cejnar M; Henderson RJ; Jones M; Hunyor SN J Hypertens; 1993 Dec; 11(12):1413-22. PubMed ID: 8133023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The correlation of ankle oscillometric blood pressures and segmental pulse volumes to Doppler systolic pressures in arterial occlusive disease. Lee BY; Campbell JS; Berkowitz P J Vasc Surg; 1996 Jan; 23(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 8558726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children. Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of three blood pressure methods used for determining ankle/brachial index in patients with intermittent claudication. Gardner AW; Montgomery PS Angiology; 1998 Sep; 49(9):723-8. PubMed ID: 9756423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of two automated monitors in the measurement of blood pressure reactivity. Trials of Hypertension Prevention Collaborative Research Group. Rosner BA; Appel LJ; Raczynski JM; Hebert PR; Whelton PK; Murphy JK; Miller ST; Oberman A Ann Epidemiol; 1990 Oct; 1(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 1669490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity and reliability of a novel slow cuff-deflation system for noninvasive blood pressure monitoring in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. Lanier GM; Orlanes K; Hayashi Y; Murphy J; Flannery M; Te-Frey R; Uriel N; Yuzefpolskaya M; Mancini DM; Naka Y; Takayama H; Jorde UP; Demmer RT; Colombo PC Circ Heart Fail; 2013 Sep; 6(5):1005-12. PubMed ID: 23811966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]