335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16267792)
1. [Use of dialysate conductivity to obtain neutral sodium balance in chronic hemodialysis patients].
Di Filippo S; Manzoni C; Pozzoni P; Locatelli F
G Ital Nefrol; 2005; 22(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 16267792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of sodium and conductivity kinetic models in predicting end-dialysis plasma water sodium concentration: preliminary results of a single-center experience.
Pozzoni P; DI Filippo S; Pontoriero G; Locatelli F
Hemodial Int; 2007 Apr; 11(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 17403167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Haemodialysis with on-line monitoring equipment: tools or toys?
Locatelli F; Buoncristiani U; Canaud B; Köhler H; Petitclerc T; Zucchelli P
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2005 Jan; 20(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 15632348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lowering postdialysis plasma sodium (conductivity) to increase sodium removal in volume-expanded hemodialysis patients: a pilot study using a biofeedback software system.
Manlucu J; Gallo K; Heidenheim PA; Lindsay RM
Am J Kidney Dis; 2010 Jul; 56(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 20303632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Assessment of salt intake in hemodialysis].
Maduell F; Navarro V
Nefrologia; 2001; 21(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 11344965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relevance of the conductivity kinetic model in the control of sodium pool.
Locatelli F; Di Filippo S; Manzoni C
Kidney Int Suppl; 2000 Aug; 76():S89-95. PubMed ID: 10936804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of sodium profiling and feedback technologies on plasma conductivity and ionic mass balance: a study in hypotension-prone dialysis patients.
Moret K; Aalten J; van den Wall Bake W; Gerlag P; Beerenhout C; van der Sande F; Leunissen K; Kooman J
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Jan; 21(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 16144849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between effective ionic dialysance and in vivo urea clearance during hemodialysis.
Lindsay RM; Bene B; Goux N; Heidenheim AP; Landgren C; Sternby J
Am J Kidney Dis; 2001 Sep; 38(3):565-74. PubMed ID: 11532690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Usefulness of the Biofeedback Diacontrol module in the automatic programming of plasmatic conductivity and ionic mass transfer].
Hernández-Jaras J; García-Pérez H; Torregrosa E; Calvo C; Cerrillo V
Nefrologia; 2003; 23(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 12708378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimal composition of the dialysate, with emphasis on its influence on blood pressure.
Locatelli F; Covic A; Chazot C; Leunissen K; Luño J; Yaqoob M
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2004 Apr; 19(4):785-96. PubMed ID: 15031331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biofeedback systems and adaptive control hemodialysis treatment.
Azar AT
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2008 Nov; 19(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 18974573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Precision of data from models of sodium kinetics in hemodialysis].
Ahrenholz P; Falkenhagen D; Hähling D; Klinkmann H
Z Urol Nephrol; 1990 Aug; 83(8):439-48. PubMed ID: 2238885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of progressive conductivity reduction with diacontrol and standard dialysis.
Selby NM; Taal MW; McIntyre CW
ASAIO J; 2007; 53(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 17413560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of sodium balance and the combination of ultrafiltration profile during sodium profiling hemodialysis on the maintenance of the quality of dialysis and sodium and fluid balances.
Song JH; Park GH; Lee SY; Lee SW; Lee SW; Kim MJ
J Am Soc Nephrol; 2005 Jan; 16(1):237-46. PubMed ID: 15563561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sodium balance in maintenance hemodialysis.
Santos SF; Peixoto AJ
Semin Dial; 2010; 23(6):549-55. PubMed ID: 21175831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do dialysate conductivity measurements provide conductivity clearance or ionic dialysance?
Petitclerc T
Kidney Int; 2006 Nov; 70(10):1682-6. PubMed ID: 16985517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variations in predialytic plasma conductivity in dialysis patients: effect on ionic mass balance and blood pressure.
Moret KE; Beerenhout CH; Kooman JP
ASAIO J; 2011; 57(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 21160422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How to determine ionic dialysance for the online assessment of delivered dialysis dose.
Di Filippo S; Manzoni C; Andrulli S; Pontoriero G; Dell'Oro C; La Milia V; Bacchini G; Crepaldi M; Bigi MC; Locatelli F
Kidney Int; 2001 Feb; 59(2):774-82. PubMed ID: 11168961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative assessment of sodium mass removal using ionic dialysance and sodium gradient as a proxy tool: Comparison of high-flux hemodialysis versus online hemodiafiltration.
Rodriguez A; Morena M; Bargnoux AS; Chenine L; Leray-Moragues H; Cristol JP; Canaud B
Artif Organs; 2021 Aug; 45(8):E280-E292. PubMed ID: 33507535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of on-line conductivity plasma ultrafiltrate kinetic modeling on cardiovascular stability of hemodialysis patients.
Locatelli F; Andrulli S; Di Filippo S; Redaelli B; Mangano S; Navino C; Ariano R; Tagliaferri M; Fidelio T; Corti M; Civardi S; Tetta C
Kidney Int; 1998 Apr; 53(4):1052-60. PubMed ID: 9551417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
