221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16267905)
1. Fraud in medical research.
Lock S
Issues Med Ethics; 1997; 5(4):112-4. PubMed ID: 16267905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. So you suspect someone of fraud. What now?
Powell K
Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):492. PubMed ID: 16675983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientific misconduct. Ill-defined, redefined.
Palca J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(5):4. PubMed ID: 8891701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Beautification and fraud.
Nat Cell Biol; 2006 Feb; 8(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 16450003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fellow scientists begin to get suspicious about data.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Oct; 16(10):6-7. PubMed ID: 11833573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Fraud in scientific research: the prosecutor's approach.
Willcox BL
Account Res; 1992; 2(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 16144093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Science comes to terms with the lessons of fraud.
Abbott A
Nature; 1999 Mar; 398(6722):13-7. PubMed ID: 10078516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Science, fraud and the Baltimore case.
Bernstein J
Commentary; 1998 Dec; 106(6):40-4. PubMed ID: 15986525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Regulation of scientific misconduct in federally funded research.
Steinberg NA
South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 2000; 10(1):39-105. PubMed ID: 12953675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Office of Scientific Integrity investigations: the importance of data analysis.
Price AA; Hallum JV
Account Res; 1992; 2(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 16144092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases.
Mosimann JE
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific fraud and misconduct.
Klein DF
J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1991 Dec; 11(6):337-8. PubMed ID: 1663134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Both accused researchers and whistle-blowers stay anonymous when no misconduct is found.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):8. PubMed ID: 16270443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct.
Reynolds GH
Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Dishonesty, misconduct and fraud in clinical research: an international problem.
Ankier SI
J Int Med Res; 2002; 30(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 12235917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Fraud in fundamental and clinical investigations. The necessity for an independent commission for scientific integrity].
Overbeke AJ
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2004; 66(5-6):343-50; discussion 351-2. PubMed ID: 15641565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fraud in scientific publishing.
Scully C; Baum B
Oral Dis; 2006 Jul; 12(4):357. PubMed ID: 16792718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Animal welfare and scientific misconduct: reviewing, investigating, and reporting violations and concerns.
Shalev M
Lab Anim (NY); 2002 May; 31(5):17-8. PubMed ID: 11984546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Change in fraud review proposed.
Culliton BJ
Nature; 1992 Mar; 356(6366):191. PubMed ID: 1313150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethics and fraud in science: a review of scientific misconduct and applications to craniofacial research.
Eliades T; Athanasiou AE; Papadopulos JS
World J Orthod; 2005; 6(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 16164106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
