These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16268835)

  • 1. A model predicting the effect of speech of varying intelligibility on work performance.
    Hongisto V
    Indoor Air; 2005 Dec; 15(6):458-68. PubMed ID: 16268835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance effects and subjective disturbance of speech in acoustically different office types--a laboratory experiment.
    Haka M; Haapakangas A; Keränen J; Hakala J; Keskinen E; Hongisto V
    Indoor Air; 2009 Dec; 19(6):454-67. PubMed ID: 19702627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relation between the intelligibility of irrelevant speech and cognitive performance-A revised model based on laboratory studies.
    Haapakangas A; Hongisto V; Liebl A
    Indoor Air; 2020 Nov; 30(6):1130-1146. PubMed ID: 32735743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of speech and speech intelligibility on task performance.
    Venetjoki N; Kaarlela-Tuomaala A; Keskinen E; Hongisto V
    Ergonomics; 2006 Sep; 49(11):1068-91. PubMed ID: 16950722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binaural intelligibility prediction based on the speech transmission index.
    van Wijngaarden SJ; Drullman R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4514-23. PubMed ID: 18537400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Computational studies of speech intelligibility in open-plan offices].
    Mikulski W
    Med Pr; 2019 Jun; 70(3):327-342. PubMed ID: 31171881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Open-plan office noise: the susceptibility and suitability of different cognitive tasks for work in the presence of irrelevant speech.
    Jahncke H
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(61):315-20. PubMed ID: 23257585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Noise and communication: a three-year update.
    Brammer AJ; Laroche C
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(61):281-6. PubMed ID: 23257578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of the influence of reverberation on binaural speech intelligibility in noise and in quiet.
    Rennies J; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 22087928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental comparison between speech transmission index, rapid speech transmission index, and speech intelligibility index.
    Larm P; Hongisto V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Feb; 119(2):1106-17. PubMed ID: 16521772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a noise reduction method--comparison between observed scores and scores predicted from STI.
    Ludvigsen C; Elberling C; Keidser G
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():50-5. PubMed ID: 8153564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined effects of acoustic and visual distraction on cognitive performance and well-being.
    Liebl A; Haller J; Jödicke B; Baumgartner H; Schlittmeier S; Hellbrück J
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Mar; 43(2):424-34. PubMed ID: 21802069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revision and validation of a binaural model for speech intelligibility in noise.
    Jelfs S; Culling JF; Lavandier M
    Hear Res; 2011 May; 275(1-2):96-104. PubMed ID: 21156201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Balancing speech intelligibility versus sound exposure in selection of personal hearing protection equipment for Chinook aircrews.
    Van Wijngaarden SJ; Rots G
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1037-44. PubMed ID: 11718509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Novel Method for Intelligibility Assessment of Nonlinearly Processed Speech in Spaces Characterized by Long Reverberation Times.
    Kurowski A; Kotus J; Odya P; Kostek B
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 35214543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech.
    Kjems U; Boldt JB; Pedersen MS; Lunner T; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1415-26. PubMed ID: 19739755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of a headset leakage on speech intelligibility in helicopter noise.
    Wagstaff AS; Tvete O; Ludvigsen B
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1996 Nov; 67(11):1034-8. PubMed ID: 8908340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subjective and objective speech intelligibility investigations in primary school classrooms.
    Astolfi A; Bottalico P; Barbato G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):247-57. PubMed ID: 22280588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of intelligibility of non-linearly processed speech.
    Ludvigsen C; Elberling C; Keidser G; Poulsen T
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():190-5. PubMed ID: 2356726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.