These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16269581)

  • 1. Two-stage case-control studies: precision of parameter estimates and considerations in selecting sample size.
    Hanley JA; Csizmadi I; Collet JP
    Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 162(12):1225-34. PubMed ID: 16269581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-stage methods for the analysis of pooled data.
    Stukel TA; Demidenko E; Dykes J; Karagas MR
    Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(14):2115-30. PubMed ID: 11439425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On a supplemented case-control design.
    Pfeiffer RM; Chatterjee N
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):584-90. PubMed ID: 16011708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the estimation and use of propensity scores in case-control and case-cohort studies.
    Månsson R; Joffe MM; Sun W; Hennessy S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 166(3):332-9. PubMed ID: 17504780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing apples and oranges: equating the power of case-control and quantitative trait association studies.
    Yang J; Wray NR; Visscher PM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 34(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 19918758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimax two-stage-designs with applications to tissue banking case-control studies.
    Shuster J; Link M; Camitta B; Pullen J; Behm F
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2479-93. PubMed ID: 12205694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample-size requirements for comparisons of two groups on repeated observations of a binary outcome.
    Leon AC
    Eval Health Prof; 2004 Mar; 27(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 14994558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interval estimation of the attributable risk for multiple exposure levels in case-control studies with confounders.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2443-57. PubMed ID: 12872301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computing differential sample size for case-control studies of gene-environment interaction.
    Efird JT; Hong MK
    Ethn Dis; 2008; 18(2 Suppl 2):S2-25-9. PubMed ID: 18646316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Likelihood methods for regression models with expensive variables missing by design.
    Zhao Y; Lawless JF; McLeish DL
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):123-36. PubMed ID: 19197954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size determination for logistic regression revisited.
    Demidenko E
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3385-97. PubMed ID: 17149799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Control of confounding through secondary samples.
    Yin L; Sundberg R; Wang X; Rubin DB
    Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(22):3814-25. PubMed ID: 16397862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study design options in evaluating gene-environment interactions: practical considerations for a planned case-control study of pediatric leukemia.
    Goodman M; Dana Flanders W
    Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2007 Apr; 48(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 16874764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The analysis of case-control studies under validation subsampling.
    Schill W; Jöckel KH
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1993 Oct; 47 Suppl 2():S34-41. PubMed ID: 8262016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sequential tests for gene-environment interactions in matched case-control studies.
    Tweel Iv; Schipper M
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(24):3755-71. PubMed ID: 15580604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using generalized additive models to reduce residual confounding.
    Benedetti A; Abrahamowicz M
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(24):3781-801. PubMed ID: 15580601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tests for gene-environment interaction from case-control data: a novel study of type I error, power and designs.
    Mukherjee B; Ahn J; Gruber SB; Rennert G; Moreno V; Chatterjee N
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 32(7):615-26. PubMed ID: 18473390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Approaches for calculating power for case-cohort studies.
    Kim MY; Xue X; Du Y
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):929-33; discussion 933. PubMed ID: 16984338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Power calculations for matched case-control studies.
    Dupont WD
    Biometrics; 1988 Dec; 44(4):1157-68. PubMed ID: 3233252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.