BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16270113)

  • 1. Patient communication following head and neck cancer surgery: a pilot study using electronic speech-generating devices.
    Happ MB; Roesch TK; Kagan SH
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2005 Nov; 32(6):1179-87. PubMed ID: 16270113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of a speech-generating device for hospitalized postoperative patients with head and neck cancer experiencing speechlessness.
    Rodriguez C; Rowe M
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2010 Mar; 37(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 20189925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Communication needs of nonspeaking hospitalized postoperative patients with head and neck cancer.
    Rodriguez CS; Blischak DM
    Appl Nurs Res; 2010 May; 23(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 20420999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nurses' perceptions of head and neck oncology patients after surgery: severity of facial disfigurement and patient gender.
    Lockhart JS
    ORL Head Neck Nurs; 1999; 17(4):12-25. PubMed ID: 11189524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of functional outcomes (speech, swallowing) in patients attending speech pathology after head and neck cancer treatment(s): results and analysis at 12 months post-intervention.
    Perry AR; Shaw MA; Cotton S
    J Laryngol Otol; 2003 May; 117(5):368-81. PubMed ID: 12803787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Counseling the head and neck cancer patient: laryngectomy.
    Holley B
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1983; 121():215-25. PubMed ID: 6878327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reconstructive and rehabilitative aspects of head and neck cancer in the elderly.
    Sanders AD; Blom ED; Singer MI; Hamaker RC
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1990 Dec; 23(6):1159-68. PubMed ID: 2074987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of a 5-week head & neck surgical oncology practicum on nursing students' perceptions of facial disfigurement: part I.
    Lockhart JS; Goodfellow LM
    ORL Head Neck Nurs; 2009; 27(3):7-12. PubMed ID: 19714953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving patient care and quality of life after laryngectomy/glossectomy.
    Dobbins M; Gunson J; Bale S; Neary M; Ingrams D; Brown M
    Br J Nurs; 2005 Jun 23-Jul 13; 14(12):634-40. PubMed ID: 16010213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Involving the patient: a prospective study on use, appreciation and effectiveness of an information system in head and neck cancer care.
    van den Brink JL; Moorman PW; de Boer MF; Pruyn JF; Verwoerd CD; van Bemmel JH
    Int J Med Inform; 2005 Oct; 74(10):839-49. PubMed ID: 16043392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of speech generating devices: a 5-year review.
    Shepherd TA; Campbell KA; Renzoni AM; Sloan N
    Augment Altern Commun; 2009; 25(3):145-53. PubMed ID: 19544105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech impairment in the postoperative head and neck cancer patient: nurses' and patients' perceptions.
    Rodriguez CS; VanCott ML
    Qual Health Res; 2005 Sep; 15(7):897-911. PubMed ID: 16093369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nursing rounds at University of Pennsylvania. Crisis in recovery.
    Thompson RP; Dropkin MJ; Kagan SH
    Am J Nurs; 2000 Jul; 100(7):51-3. PubMed ID: 10950742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A UK multi-centre pilot study of speech and swallowing outcomes following head and neck cancer.
    Radford K; Woods H; Lowe D; Rogers SN
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 2004 Aug; 29(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 15270826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for wound infection in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma surgery with opening of mucosa. Study of 260 surgical procedures.
    Penel N; Fournier C; Lefebvre D; Lefebvre JL
    Oral Oncol; 2005 Mar; 41(3):294-303. PubMed ID: 15743692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Disclosure of the diagnosis to the patient with head and neck cancer].
    Yildirim T; Erişen L
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2008; 18(5):273-9. PubMed ID: 19155671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition software as an assistive device: a pilot study of user satisfaction and psychosocial impact.
    Derosier R; Farber RS
    Work; 2005; 25(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 16131742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A supportive nursing care clinic: conceptions of patients with head and neck cancer.
    Larsson M; Hedelin B; Athlin E
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2007 Feb; 11(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 17185036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Communication interventions involving speech-generating devices for children with autism: a review of the literature.
    van der Meer LA; Rispoli M
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2010; 13(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 20629595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The quality of preoperative information to head and neck cancer patients: a qualitative study].
    Ragaccio A; Lombardo A; Garrone P
    Assist Inferm Ric; 2007; 26(4):200-9. PubMed ID: 18297984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.