75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16270234)
1. Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients.
Chatterjee M; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Shannon RV
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Mar; 7(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 16270234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Forward-masking patterns produced by symmetric and asymmetric pulse shapes in electric hearing.
Macherey O; van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Dhooge I; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):326-38. PubMed ID: 20058980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tripolar configuration and pulse shape in cochlear implants reduce channel interactions in the temporal domain.
Quass GL; Kral A
Hear Res; 2024 Mar; 443():108953. PubMed ID: 38277881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring the Use of Interleaved Stimuli to Measure Cochlear-Implant Excitation Patterns.
Guérit F; Middlebrooks JC; Gransier R; Richardson ML; Wouters J; Carlyon RP
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2024 Apr; 25(2):201-213. PubMed ID: 38459245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of Sound Coding Strategies to Make Singing Music More Accessible for Cochlear Implant Users.
Tahmasebi S; Segovia-Martinez M; Nogueira W
Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165221148022. PubMed ID: 36628453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recent Advances in Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Design Parameters.
Ertas YN; Ozpolat D; Karasu SN; Ashammakhi N
Micromachines (Basel); 2022 Jul; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 35888898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tonotopic Selectivity in Cats and Humans: Electrophysiology and Psychophysics.
Guérit F; Middlebrooks JC; Richardson ML; Arneja A; Harland AJ; Gransier R; Wouters J; Carlyon RP
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Aug; 23(4):513-534. PubMed ID: 35697952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.
Garadat SN; Colesa DJ; Swiderski DL; Raphael Y; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2022 Feb; 414():108404. PubMed ID: 34883366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners: Effects of age and the electrode-neuron interface.
Jahn KN; DeVries L; Arenberg JG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Mar; 149(3):1633. PubMed ID: 33765782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech recognition with cochlear implants as a function of the number of channels: Effects of electrode placement.
Berg KA; Noble JH; Dawant BM; Dwyer RT; Labadie RF; Gifford RH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3646. PubMed ID: 32486813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auditory enhancement and the role of spectral resolution in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant users.
Feng L; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Aug; 144(2):552. PubMed ID: 30180692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Physiological Spread of Excitation in Cochlear Implants.
Spitzer ER; Hughes ML
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):786-798. PubMed ID: 28972468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial Selectivity in Cochlear Implants: Effects of Asymmetric Waveforms and Development of a Single-Point Measure.
Carlyon RP; Deeks JM; Undurraga J; Macherey O; van Wieringen A
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 18(5):711-727. PubMed ID: 28755309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of stimulus level and rate on psychophysical thresholds for interleaved pulse trains in cochlear implants.
Hughes ML; Goehring JL; Baudhuin JL; Schmid KK
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):2297. PubMed ID: 27794318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reducing Channel Interaction Through Cochlear Implant Programming May Improve Speech Perception: Current Focusing and Channel Deactivation.
Bierer JA; Litvak L
Trends Hear; 2016 Jun; 20():. PubMed ID: 27317668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of current focusing on the sensitivity of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated stimulation.
George SS; Shivdasani MN; Fallon JB
J Neurophysiol; 2016 Sep; 116(3):1104-16. PubMed ID: 27306672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Excitation Patterns of Standard and Steered Partial Tripolar Stimuli in Cochlear Implants.
Wu CC; Luo X
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 17(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 26691160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Envelope Interactions in Multi-Channel Amplitude Modulation Frequency Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users.
Galvin JJ; Oba SI; Başkent D; Chatterjee M; Fu QJ
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139546. PubMed ID: 26431043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
