172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16270296)
1. 3.0 T vs. 1.5 T MR angiography: in vitro comparison of intravascular stent artifacts.
Wall A; Kugel H; Bachman R; Matuszewski L; Krämer S; Heindel W; Maintz D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 22(6):772-9. PubMed ID: 16270296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Artifact-free coronary magnetic resonance angiography and coronary vessel wall imaging in the presence of a new, metallic, coronary magnetic resonance imaging stent.
Spuentrup E; Ruebben A; Mahnken A; Stuber M; Kölker C; Nguyen TH; Günther RW; Buecker A
Circulation; 2005 Mar; 111(8):1019-26. PubMed ID: 15723984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo evaluation of the carotid wallstent on three-dimensional contrast material-enhanced MR angiography: influence of artifacts on the visibility of stent lumina.
Borisch I; Hamer OW; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Link J
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2005 May; 16(5):669-77. PubMed ID: 15872322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Magnetic resonance imaging of stents: quantitative in vitro examination at 3 Tesla].
Reinhardt J; Nguyen-Trong TH; Hähnel S; Bellemann ME; Heiland S
Z Med Phys; 2009; 19(4):278-87. PubMed ID: 19995528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stent appearance at contrast-enhanced MR angiography: in vitro examination with 14 stents.
Lenhart M; Völk M; Manke C; Nitz WR; Strotzer M; Feuerbach S; Link J
Radiology; 2000 Oct; 217(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 11012441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Revealing in-stent stenoses of the iliac arteries: comparison of multidetector CT with MR angiography and digital radiographic angiography in a Phantom model.
Maintz D; Tombach B; Juergens KU; Weigel S; Heindel W; Fischbach R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Nov; 179(5):1319-22. PubMed ID: 12388521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved in-stent lumen visualization using intravascular MRI and a balanced steady-state free-precession sequence.
Gilbert G; Soulez G; Beaudoin G
Acad Radiol; 2009 Dec; 16(12):1466-74. PubMed ID: 19836269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High spatial-resolution CE-MRA of the carotid circulation with parallel imaging: comparison of image quality between 2 different acceleration factors at 3.0 Tesla.
Nael K; Ruehm SG; Michaely HJ; Pope W; Laub G; Finn JP; Villablanca JP
Invest Radiol; 2006 Apr; 41(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 16523022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal scanning protocols of 64-slice CT angiography in coronary artery stents: an in vitro phantom study.
Almutairi AM; Sun Z; Ng C; Al-Safran ZA; Al-Mulla AA; Al-Jamaan AI
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 74(1):156-60. PubMed ID: 19231124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance angiography of endovascular aortic stent grafts: phantom measurements in comparison with 1.5 Tesla.
Krämer SC; Wall A; Maintz D; Bachmann R; Kugel H; Heindel W
Invest Radiol; 2004 Jul; 39(7):413-7. PubMed ID: 15194912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography: comparison between a Gd-BOPTA- and a Gd-DTPA-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo sequence and a non-contrast-enhanced steady-state free-precession sequence.
Nassenstein K; Breuckmann F; Hunold P; Barkhausen J; Schlosser T
Acta Radiol; 2009 May; 50(4):406-11. PubMed ID: 19308763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro evaluation of intravascular stent artifacts in three-dimensional MR angiography.
Maintz D; Kugel H; Schellhammer F; Landwehr P
Invest Radiol; 2001 Apr; 36(4):218-24. PubMed ID: 11283419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of routinely postprocessed (CLEAR) CE-MRA data sets: are SNR and CNR calculations reliable?
Buerke B; Allkemper T; Kugel H; Bremer C; Evers S; Kooijman H; Heindel W; Tombach B
Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1111-7. PubMed ID: 18692751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 T: comparison with steady-state free precession technique at 1.5 T.
Liu X; Bi X; Huang J; Jerecic R; Carr J; Li D
Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):663-8. PubMed ID: 18708861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5 T after implantation of platinum stents: in vitro and in vivo comparison with conventional stent designs.
Hagspiel KD; Leung DA; Nandalur KR; Angle JF; Dulai HS; Spinosa DJ; Matsumoto AH; Christopher JM; Ahmed H; Berr SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):288-94. PubMed ID: 15615990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3.0 Tesla high spatial resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the pulmonary circulation: initial experience with a 32-channel phased array coil using a high relaxivity contrast agent.
Nael K; Fenchel M; Krishnam M; Finn JP; Laub G; Ruehm SG
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):392-8. PubMed ID: 17507810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Off-resonance magnetic resonance angiography improves visualization of in-stent lumen in peripheral nitinol stents compared to conventional T1-weighted acquisitions: an in vitro comparison study.
Gitsioudis G; Fortner P; Stuber M; Missiou A; Andre F; Müller OJ; Katus HA; Korosoglou G
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Nov; 32(11):1645-1655. PubMed ID: 27535040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noncontrast 3D steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance angiography of the whole chest using nonselective radiofrequency excitation over a large field of view: comparison with single-phase 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.
Krishnam MS; Tomasian A; Deshpande V; Tran L; Laub G; Finn JP; Ruehm SG
Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 18496046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of carotid artery after stenting.
Teng MM; Tsai F; Liou AJ; Lirng JF; Chang FC; Luo CB; Cheng HC
J Neuroimaging; 2004 Oct; 14(4):336-41. PubMed ID: 15358954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noncontrast 3D steady state free precession magnetic resonance angiography of the thoracic central veins using nonselective radiofrequency excitation over a large field of view: initial experience.
Tomasian A; Lohan DG; Laub G; Singhal A; Finn JP; Krishnam MS
Invest Radiol; 2008 May; 43(5):306-13. PubMed ID: 18424951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
