These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16270344)
1. Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. Rupp F; Scheideler L; Olshanska N; de Wild M; Wieland M; Geis-Gerstorfer J J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Feb; 76(2):323-34. PubMed ID: 16270344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modified titanium surfaces promote accelerated osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells in vitro. Wall I; Donos N; Carlqvist K; Jones F; Brett P Bone; 2009 Jul; 45(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 19332166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Osteoblastic cell behaviour on different titanium implant surfaces. Le Guehennec L; Lopez-Heredia MA; Enkel B; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P Acta Biomater; 2008 May; 4(3):535-43. PubMed ID: 18226985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adsorption of human plasma proteins to modified titanium surfaces. Sela MN; Badihi L; Rosen G; Steinberg D; Kohavi D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):630-8. PubMed ID: 17484735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface. Ferguson SJ; Broggini N; Wieland M; de Wild M; Rupp F; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Cochran DL; Buser D J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Aug; 78(2):291-7. PubMed ID: 16637025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque. Elias CN; Oshida Y; Lima JH; Muller CA J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Jul; 1(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 19627788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. Zhao G; Schwartz Z; Wieland M; Rupp F; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Cochran DL; Boyan BD J Biomed Mater Res A; 2005 Jul; 74(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 15924300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cleaning and heat-treatment effects on unalloyed titanium implant surfaces. Kilpadi DV; Lemons JE; Liu J; Raikar GN; Weimer JJ; Vohra Y Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):219-30. PubMed ID: 10795454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Initial contact angle measurements on variously treated dental/medical titanium materials. Lim YJ; Oshida Y Biomed Mater Eng; 2001; 11(4):325-41. PubMed ID: 11790864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comment to the paper: Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces, by F. Rupp, L. Scheideler, N. Olshanska, M. de Wild, M. Wieland, J. Geis-Gerstorfer. Morra M; Volpe CD; Siboni S J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Dec; 79(3):752-4; author reply 755-7. PubMed ID: 16983654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Observation of topography and analysis of surface contamination of titanium implant after roughness treatment]. Cao H; Yang X; Wu D; Zhang X Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 24(2):372-5. PubMed ID: 17591263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semi-conducting properties of titanium dioxide surfaces on titanium implants. Petersson IU; Löberg JE; Fredriksson AS; Ahlberg EK Biomaterials; 2009 Sep; 30(27):4471-9. PubMed ID: 19524291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surface modification of titanium by etching in concentrated sulfuric acid. Ban S; Iwaya Y; Kono H; Sato H Dent Mater; 2006 Dec; 22(12):1115-20. PubMed ID: 16375960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles. Bornstein MM; Valderrama P; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Seibl R; Cochran DL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 18177427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Osteoconductivity of hydrophilic microstructured titanium implants with phosphate ion chemistry. Park JW; Jang JH; Lee CS; Hanawa T Acta Biomater; 2009 Jul; 5(6):2311-21. PubMed ID: 19332400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adsorption/desorption phenomena on pure and Teflon AF-coated titania surfaces studied by dynamic contact angle analysis. Rupp F; Axmann D; Ziegler C; Geis-Gerstorfer J J Biomed Mater Res; 2002 Dec; 62(4):567-78. PubMed ID: 12221705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits. Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of supramicron roughness characteristics produced by 1- and 2-step acid etching on the osseointegration capability of titanium. Att W; Tsukimura N; Suzuki T; Ogawa T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 17974105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]