These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16270438)
1. IRBs and human embryonic stem cell experimentation. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2002 Jan; 17(1):5. PubMed ID: 16270438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Federally funding human embryonic stem cell research: an administrative analysis. Gross GS Wis L Rev; 2000; 4():855-84. PubMed ID: 12664903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Research ethics. The NIH draft guidelines on human stem cell research. Majumder MA; Cohen CB Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5935):1648-9. PubMed ID: 19556488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Institutional review boards have new role in stem cell research. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2000 Oct; 15(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11913434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research: an institutional examination. Fujikawa R South Calif Law Rev; 2005 May; 78(4):1075-124. PubMed ID: 17340756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The stem cell debate: the legal, political and ethical issues surrounding federal funding of scientific research on human embryos. George EP Albany Law J Sci Technol; 2002; 12(2):747-803. PubMed ID: 15212013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. New embryonic stem-cell research guidelines criticized. Doerflinger R Origins; 2000 Sep; 30(13):193,5. PubMed ID: 11873806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Specially respecting the living human embryo by adhering to standard human subject experimentation rules. Casey SB; Adams NA Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 2(1):109, 111-41. PubMed ID: 12664939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Federal funding and the regulation of embryonic stem cell research: the Pontius Pilate maneuver. Levine RJ Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2009; 9 Suppl():552-64. PubMed ID: 19757720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The promise and peril of embryonic stem cell research: a call for vigilant oversight. Frist B Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 2(1):109, 167-76. PubMed ID: 12664942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reflections on the United States National Institutes of Health draft guidelines for research involving human pluripotent stem cells--theological perspective. Sotis JJ Med Etika Bioet; 2000; 7(1-2):19-21. PubMed ID: 11933979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stem cells. Restiveness grows at NIH over Bush research restrictions. Holden C Science; 2005 Apr; 308(5720):334-5. PubMed ID: 15831721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Stem cell protocols: the NAS guidelines are a useful start. Johnston J Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(6):16-7. PubMed ID: 16396200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The California gambit. The Golden State has launched a 3bn dollar wager on stem cell science. Gibbs WW Sci Am; 2005 Jul; 293(1):A24-7. PubMed ID: 16008298 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]