These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16270443)
1. Both accused researchers and whistle-blowers stay anonymous when no misconduct is found. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):8. PubMed ID: 16270443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Privacy of researchers versus public's right to know their names. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2005 May; 20(5):8. PubMed ID: 16175715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Health department lays down the law on scientific misconduct. Wadman M Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6985):786. PubMed ID: 15103337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Animal welfare and scientific misconduct: reviewing, investigating, and reporting violations and concerns. Shalev M Lab Anim (NY); 2002 May; 31(5):17-8. PubMed ID: 11984546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Whistles blow in vain on bad practice in German research. Abbott A Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):218. PubMed ID: 14628012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Researcher sues government and specific agency official over misconduct investigation. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):9. PubMed ID: 12530382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct. Sovacool BK Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Due process in investigations of research misconduct. Mello MM; Brennan TA N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Whistle-blower claims his accusations cost him his job. Reich ES Nature; 2011 Jun; 474(7350):140-1. PubMed ID: 21654778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Sitting in judgement. Check E Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. US free-speech law offers protection--at a price. Samuel Reich E Nature; 2011 Mar; 471(7338):276-7. PubMed ID: 21412304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. So you suspect someone of fraud. What now? Powell K Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):492. PubMed ID: 16675983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct. Reynolds GH Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Commentary on "The fallout: what happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?" (J.S. Lubalin and J.L. Matheson). Swazey JP Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):251-3. PubMed ID: 11657862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]