These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16270457)

  • 1. Sell v. United States: the appropriate standard for involuntarily administering antipsychotic drugs to dangerous detainees for trial.
    Borger BA
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2005; 35(3):1099-120. PubMed ID: 16270457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forcible medication for courtroom competence--the case of Charles Sell.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2004 May; 350(22):2297-301. PubMed ID: 15163782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forcible medication and personal autonomy: the case of Charles Thomas Sell.
    Quinlan M
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 2004 Feb; 84(1):275-99. PubMed ID: 16211756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
    Klein DW
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mental health advance directives: having one's say?
    Dunlap JA
    KY Law J; 2000; 89(2):327-86. PubMed ID: 12737165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Presumed dangerous: California's selective policy of forcibly medicating state prisoners with antipsychotic drugs.
    Gross DE
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 2002 Jan; 35():483-517. PubMed ID: 17066562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Between madness and death: the medicate-to-execute controversy.
    Latzer B
    Crim Justice Ethics; 2003; 22(2):3-14. PubMed ID: 15080128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Of pills and needs: involuntarily medicating the psychotic inmate when execution looms.
    Cantor JD
    Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):117-70. PubMed ID: 17111502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sell v. U.S.: involuntary treatment case or catalyst for change?
    Leong GB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):292-4. PubMed ID: 16186189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Losing your rights: complications of misdiagnosis.
    Rappaport RG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):436-8. PubMed ID: 17185470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forced medication of defendants to achieve trial competency: an update on the law after Sell.
    Hilgers K; Ramer P
    Georget J Leg Ethics; 2004; 17(4):813-26. PubMed ID: 15685765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seeking an answer: questioning the validity of forcible medication to ensure mental competency of those condemned to die.
    Stricker BW
    McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):317-40. PubMed ID: 15709265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Constitutional law--substantive due process--Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that criminal defendant's best interests justify forcible medication.--Commonwealth v. Sam, 952 A.2d 565 (Pa. 2008).
    Harv Law Rev; 2009 May; 122(7):1961-8. PubMed ID: 19492499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Mind control," "synthetic sanity," "artificial competence," and genuine confusion: legally relevant effects of antipsychotic medication.
    Gutheil TG; Appelbaum PS
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1983; 12(1):77-120. PubMed ID: 15739272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forcible medication of mentally ill criminal defendants: the case of Russell Eugene Weston, Jr.
    Feinberg A
    Stanford Law Rev; 2002 Apr; 54(4):769-91. PubMed ID: 11944661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The involuntary medication of Jared Loughner and pretrial jail detainees in nonmedical correctional facilities.
    Felthous AR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):98-112. PubMed ID: 22396347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Major tranquilizers in prison: drug therapy and the unconsenting inmate.
    Sitnick SA
    Willamette Law J; 1975; 11(3):378-97. PubMed ID: 11664569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protecting our mentally ill: a critique of the role of Indiana state courts in protecting involuntarily committed mental patients' right to refuse medication.
    Goff ML
    Indiana Law J; 2001; 76(4):983-1000. PubMed ID: 12455521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treating incompetent defendants: the Supreme Court's decision is a tough Sell.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Oct; 54(10):1335-6,1341. PubMed ID: 14557516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.