These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16270465)

  • 21. After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
    Giubilini A; Minerva F
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):261-3. PubMed ID: 22361296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The need for balancing the reproductive rights of women and the unborn in the Mexican courtroom.
    Arellano Mde J
    Med Law Rev; 2010; 18(3):427-33. PubMed ID: 20739439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Women's rights vs. Catholic dogma.
    Moriarty C
    Int Social Rev; 1973 Mar; 34(3):8-11+. PubMed ID: 11664686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Early delivery of a fetus with anencephaly.
    Ford N
    Ethics Medics; 2003 Jul; 28(7):1-4. PubMed ID: 16206470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
    Borgmann CE
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The hand as emblem of human identity: a solution to the abortion controversy based on science and reason.
    Hope D
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 2001; 32(2):205-28. PubMed ID: 16485373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute.
    Gough AD
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):187-214. PubMed ID: 12774818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A woman's right to choose: designation of fetal tissue donees.
    Fazio TJ
    Hofstra Law Rev; 2001; 30(2):533-55. PubMed ID: 12666683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Conflicts between protecting and respecting women: the prohibition of sex-selected birth.
    Dickens BM
    Hum Health Care Int; 1997; 13(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 16729411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Abortion and its viability standard: the woman's diminishing right to choose.
    Swyers MH
    Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1997; 8(1-2):87-109. PubMed ID: 14628785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Abortion rights judgment: a ray of hope!
    Johari V; Jadhav U
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2017; 2(3):180-183. PubMed ID: 28279947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How not to argue for abortion rights: fighting for choice is not enough.
    Johnson A
    Free Inq; 2005; 25(2):38-41. PubMed ID: 15856594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A bias for life: abortion does not justify harmful research.
    Siegel S
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(4):109-17. PubMed ID: 11663564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. After-birth and before-birth personhood: why the baby should live.
    Knoepffler NJ; O'Malley MJ
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e11-4. PubMed ID: 23637454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Created equal: how the Declaration of Independence recognizes and guarantees the right to life for the unborn.
    Trapp M
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 2001; 28(4):819-47. PubMed ID: 16528851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Abortion and human rights.
    Shaw D
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):633-46. PubMed ID: 20303830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A debate on abortion.
    Hasker W; Sullivan TD
    Hum Life Rev; 1979; 5(2):28-48. PubMed ID: 11663944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Brief supports partial-birth abortion ban.
    Catholic Church. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops [USCCB]
    Origins; 2006 Jun; 36(4):58-63. PubMed ID: 16832962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Worth the wait? A critique of the Abortion Act 2008 (Vic).
    Oreb N
    J Law Med; 2009 Oct; 17(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 19998595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The development of the undue burden standard in Stenberg v. Carhart: will proposed RU-486 legislation survive?
    Guenther H
    Indiana Law Rev; 2002; 35(3):1021-44. PubMed ID: 16211757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.