These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16270850)

  • 1. An evaluation of simultaneous presentation and differential reinforcement with response cost to reduce packing.
    Buckley SD; Newchok DK
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(3):405-9. PubMed ID: 16270850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of simultaneous and sequential presentation of preferred and nonpreferred food to treat food selectivity.
    Piazza CC; Patel MR; Santana CM; Goh HL; Delia MD; Lancaster BM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 12365739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using simultaneous presentation to increase vegetable consumption in a mildly selective child with autism.
    Ahearn WH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(3):361-5. PubMed ID: 14596577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context.
    Carr JE; Nicolson AC; Higbee TS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(3):353-7. PubMed ID: 11051581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing preferences for positive and negative reinforcement during treatment of destructive behavior with functional communication training.
    Fisher WW; Adelinis JD; Volkert VM; Keeney KM; Neidert PL; Hovanetz A
    Res Dev Disabil; 2005; 26(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 15590246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reducing wandering by persons with dementia using differential reinforcement.
    Heard K; Watson TS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(3):381-4. PubMed ID: 10513031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of simultaneous and delayed reinforcement as treatments for food selectivity.
    Kern L; Marder TJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):243-6. PubMed ID: 8682740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The individual characteristics of dogs with a free choice of the probability and value of food reinforcement].
    Preobrazhenskiĭ LA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1997; 47(3):487-99. PubMed ID: 9273788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential reinforcement with and without instructional fading.
    Ringdahl JE; Kitsukawa K; Andelman MS; Call N; Winborn L; Barretto A; Reed GK
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(3):291-4. PubMed ID: 12365743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of response cost and differential reinforcement of other behavior to reduce disruptive behavior in a preschool classroom.
    Conyers C; Miltenberger R; Maki A; Barenz R; Jurgens M; Sailer A; Haugen M; Kopp B
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2004; 37(3):411-5. PubMed ID: 15529899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential impact of response effort within a response chain on use of mands in a student with autism.
    Buckley SD; Newchok DK
    Res Dev Disabil; 2005; 26(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 15590240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of a multicomponent treatment for food refusal.
    Kahng SW; Tarbox J; Wilke AE
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 11317996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of modeling contingencies in the treatment of food selectivity in children with autism.
    Fu SB; Penrod B; Fernand JK; Whelan CM; Griffith K; Medved S
    Behav Modif; 2015 Nov; 39(6):771-84. PubMed ID: 26134303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of dense-to-lean and fixed lean schedules of alternative reinforcement and extinction.
    Hagopian LP; Toole LM; Long ES; Bowman LG; Lieving GA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2004; 37(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 15529889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation of strategies to maintain mands at practical levels.
    Sidener TM; Shabani DB; Carr JE; Roland JP
    Res Dev Disabil; 2006; 27(6):632-44. PubMed ID: 16298103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An alternative method of thinning reinforcer delivery during differential reinforcement.
    Roane HS; Fisher WW; Sgro GM; Falcomata TS; Pabico RR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2004; 37(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 15293640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.
    DeLeon IG; Iwata BA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(4):519-32; quiz 532-3. PubMed ID: 8995834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of texture fading in the treatment of food selectivity.
    Shore BA; Babbitt RL; Williams KE; Coe DA; Snyder A
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(4):621-33. PubMed ID: 9891398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing pica by teaching children to exchange inedible items for edibles.
    Kern L; Starosta K; Adelman BE
    Behav Modif; 2006 Mar; 30(2):135-58. PubMed ID: 16464843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increasing variety of foods consumed by blending nonpreferred foods into preferred foods.
    Mueller MM; Piazza CC; Patel MR; Kelley ME; Pruett A
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2004; 37(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 15293635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.